• ChristopherA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    So, while this user (and their many reincarnations) has really impacted my enjoyment of Lemmy over the last couple of weeks, they do highlight one of the larger shortcomings of the platform. There’s nothing stopping an unstable, disturbed, bored person from grinding through accounts. A problem on any platform, for sure. Though folks like this do seem to filter out in the noise of larger projects.

    I don’t have a solution for this. But I’m nearly to the point of tearing down my own instance.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, that tracks. Without fed-wide IP blacklists or something, I suppose it’s really easy to just instance hop and be a dick. Or spin up your own and be a dick.

      • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Allow me… To create a frontend framework that just hides content you don’t want to see… Maybe even a feature that hides users too… I’ll add in some keywords…

        Ooh let’s call it Penteract!

      • 0ops@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        …federating block-lists is actually an interesting idea. Instances already federate posts, comments, communities, and users. An instance could publish a public block-list, and admins of other instances could “subscribe” to block-lists across the fediverse that they trust, reducing some of the redundant labor of each instance’s admins maintaining their own separate block-lists. It’s kind of a similar idea to ublock origin’s various filter lists.