• SoakedBread@multiverse.soulism.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I still sticking with Qobuz. 70% of the time I listen to music I try to discover new artists and find obscure stuff. It would be way to time consuming to download random stuff via. Soulseek in hope to find a single track I like. So the discoverability of streaming services is unbeaten. If I like an Artist, I either download the tracks on Soulseek (Which is pain in the ass in my opinion) or I buy it via. bandcamp to add the to my offline collection.

        • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Man I have zero issues with Soulseek. I’ve gotten so much stuff from there. Even obscure. What struggles do you have with it?

          • SoakedBread@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            If I am searching for something I mostly will find it, but only 1/4 of my downloads complete. Most of the time the downloads stuck at the status “queued” and won’t download. I have to find at least 4 different sources to get the Track I want. I’m using Nicotine+.

            • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Are you sharing too? Most people on there autoblock transfers if the DLer isn’t sharing.

              I haven’t used Nicotine+ so I can’t be sure there isn’t something with that. I just use the soulseekQt client.

              • SoakedBread@multiverse.soulism.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Yes. Always. About 60Gb. Maybe it’s the Client but I don’t think this will solve the problem but I will try soulseekQt.

                Edit: Wow. I think this was the solution! With the OG Soulseek Client every request is downloading within seconds! The Client looks a little bit out of date, but if it works, I don’t mind. Surprisingly I get some bot messages every few request to prove I’m human. I never got these kind of messages with Nicotine+. Thank you very much!

          • nailingjello@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Where can I find more info on Soulseek? I’d rather not web search and land somewhere and get bad info.

            • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              This is the main site, https://www.slsknet.org/news/faq-page I’m linking you to the FAQ. You can get the client there too.

              Concept is simple. It’s searchable p2p file sharing. You have the client, open/filter two ports on your firewall (soulseek qt has a button to check the ports are open), share a folder with media you want to share with others, then start searching for things you’d like. You can filter searches too. I keep my searches filtered to flac files for example.

              As a note, some people are weird about you downloading too much in one go, so good rule of thumb is to DL no more than 1 album at a time from someone. Some people are stupid weird about it though and will block access if you queue more than a single file. Just put them on your block list too and unshare from them and move on. It’s not worth it to message people like that.

      • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m downloading thousands of albums now in a bid to archive and run my own streaming service and let me tell you, I probably won’t ever unsubscribe from Tidal.

          • Axolotl@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not everyone have static IP

            You can use a DDNS

            and device that can work as server

            Yep, if you don’t have any hardware or money that sucks, the hardware costs a lot, what i could buy with 20-30€ costs over the hundreds

              • Axolotl@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Khm-khm, arm boards, khm-khm

                Even x86 hardware, because everyone is now selling shit without RAM and SSD/HDDs but with the same prices

                I need to dig into that a bit more, but I’m not sure if it will work with NAT on ISP side (with is a common thing at least in region I’m from).

                It should work in theory

                • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Not sure how DDNS would work with CGNAT since multiple users would be sharing one public IP address.

                  There’s other solutions though. Tailscale for one

              • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Tailscale or cloudflare tunnel should fix your CGNAT issue. The former is more private I believe.