This is a general view on the topic. I think open-source isn’t enough, we need also governance for the software we use, and create small pockets of freedom.

All feedback is welcome.

  • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.todaydeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    No, you absolutely don’t. Governance is what destroys open-source projects. For instance, GNOME was destroyed and encrappified because of their board, for instance (a bad governance structure). Look at how IBM does governance to Wayland. That should show you that it doesn’t work.

    • Kissaki@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Does that mean that we need a different kind of governance, or none at all?

      Successful independent projects have some form of governance too, no?

      • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.todaydeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The BDFI (Benevolent Dictator for Life) method works as it should. People should be using that one more. For instance, Vim had Moolenar as the BDFI, and it was a good thing for the project.