cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agoJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1737arrow-down18
arrow-up1729arrow-down1imageJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareBjörn Tantau@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·2 days agoDesign requirements are too ambiguous.
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agoDesign requirements are what it should do, not how it does it.
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoI’m a systems analyst, or in agile terminology “a designer” as I’m responsible for “design artifacts” Our designs are usually unambiguous
minus-squareheavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 days agoThat’s why you must negotiate or clarify what is being asked. Once it has been accepted, it is not ambiguous anymore as long as you respect it.
Design requirements are too ambiguous.
Design requirements are what it should do, not how it does it.
I’m a systems analyst, or in agile terminology “a designer” as I’m responsible for “design artifacts”
Our designs are usually unambiguous
That’s why you must negotiate or clarify what is being asked. Once it has been accepted, it is not ambiguous anymore as long as you respect it.