Linux 7.2 has landed, dragging x86 timing clean out of the nineties by making the Time Stamp Counter mandatory.
I wrote up a quick article on why ditching those ancient legacy fallbacks is good housekeeping, plus a few other bits like cache-aware scheduling and memory tweaks worth noting.
Is anyone still using legacy hardware? If so, what do you use it for?



You can (compile and) run almost all Linux software on the BSDs.
deleted by creator
FreeBSD’s jails are pretty interesting though, so is NetBSD’s rump kernel. But my point was (especially older) hardware support, not software support. If all you care about is the sheer number of available applications, Windows is there for you. 😉
Your post that it was “not even close” is misleading at best and utterly wrong in total.
deleted by creator
So is Linux, compared to macOS and Windows. You still use it, as it seems to be just enough for your own needs.
deleted by creator
Mine don’t.
Source?
Compared to Windows, Linux is more of a niche OS for hobbyists. (My everyday device is a desktop, not a router.) Your point is what exactly? Operating systems need a certain market share to be good? Lol. Seriously, just lol.
Enjoy your ~3% niche OS.
deleted by creator
Ok. Enjoy being where most people are (Microsoft 365?).
I will not do that. Because I don’t care about what other people use. I want my software to make my life easier. If there are only three people alive who use a good software, I still wouldn’t want to use worse software.
Name one Linux software that actually is “Linux software” in opposite to “Unix-like software” and/or “cross-platform software”.
My laughing nerve is, indeed, somewhat sore now.
So your point is that you prefer mainstream software over good software? Are you sure that you don’t use Windows?