• Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      13 days ago

      Right. You’re calling ‘that fucker’, ‘retarded.’ You see ‘a fucker’, and you decide to call them ‘a person with developmental challenges’.

      You’re associating ‘people with developmental challenges’, with ‘fuckers’. Don’t.

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Nobody’s “associating” anything. Nobody who’s calling someone retarded has any thoughts in their head about people with the mental disorder. If you called them a downie, then you would probably have a point; as it’s specifically worded to relate to downs syndrome.

        But “retard” has come to be an amplification of the word “idiot”. It’s like the words big, bigger, biggest.

        It’s the “biggest” of “idiot”.

        So if I’m gonna call someone an idiot, my levels of idiot are: Idiot, Dumb-ass, and Retard. I’m just calling them the word that corresponds to being a gargantuan idiot. You can’t use “gargantuan” because they don’t even know what the words mean; so you use retard.

        • AJ1@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          hey I have a question: how does everyone feel about “fucktard”? is that acceptable? it’s not a direct insult to persons with developmental disabilities, but it does have a fairly specific connotation that could be useful in certain situations, plus it throws out an F-bomb to emphasize your anger.

          but if that’s too offensive for some folks I guess I can just keep using “fuckmouth”, if that’s easier on the ears.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            but if that’s too offensive for some folks I guess I can just keep using “fuckmouth”, if that’s easier on the ears.

            fuck mouth might be too insensitive for those of us who have or don’t have sex, so basically all of humanity actually.

        • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Nobody who’s calling someone retarded has any thoughts in their head about people with the mental disorder.

          Right, except for the part where that’s the literal definition of the word. The literal definition.

          The people who were diagnosed as ‘retarded’ as children and adults are still alive. It’s living memory. You think they don’t have any thoughts in their head about mental disorders?

          • kitnaht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            “Retarded” isn’t a medical definition under IDC-11, so they aren’t retarded, as the medical definitions have changed.

            Also Retarded has another standard definition – Being held back or stunted of which applies here.

            • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              13 days ago

              Right, because it was being used as a slur. They stopped using that word to define those conditions because it was being used as a slur. Thanks for the good faith argument.

              • kitnaht@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                They stopped using that word because it wasn’t descriptive. The same reason they stopped diagnosing women as “hysterical”. That’s the cool thing about the sciences; they evolve and change over time to be more descriptive, not less.

                And now, we use the word hysterical to describe certain things…kinda cool how that works, right? When I call something hysterical (extremely funny) - people don’t get offended and say I’m using a slur.

                Or when someone is losing their shit, you say they’re acting hysterical. It’s become a descriptor.

                • deathbird@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  losing their shit

                  Hey hey hey, let’s not use incontinence as an insult my dude.

                • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Why are we changing the term “mental retardation” to “intellectual disability”?

                  The term “intellectual disability” is gradually replacing the term “mental retardation” nationwide. Advocates for individuals with intellectual disability have rightfully asserted that the term “mental retardation” has negative connotations, has become offensive to many people, and often results in misunderstandings about the nature of the disorder and those who have it.

                  Thanks for the totally good faith argument.

                  • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    Gradually?? I don’t think the r word has been directly related to mental disability the entire time I’ve been alive, and I’m not exactly young… You’re just choosing to take offense, which is white-knighting for the disabled when they’re not even being insulted… Kinda’ … extremely lame of you…

                    Oh wait, being lame used to be a health disorder! Guess I’m offending you again…

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        if someone is stupid, and making objectively stupid decisions, it would be fair to call them “developmentally challenged” especially if that person is donald trump, and the stupid decision is tariffs.

        Would it also be fair to call him a retard? Yes.

        should you? Probably not, would it be justified, yes.

        It’s only really fucked up if you’re using it belittle and demean someone, though there are also situations where this is deserved. Morals and ethics aren’t really a solid ground to stand on, more so a floating mass of garbage in the ocean, that just sort of, showed up one day.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            yeah, probably shouldn’t doesn’t mean you can’t though.

            Just because you probably shouldn’t yell at people, or swear at them, doesn’t mean you can’t or won’t.

            Not everything in this world is a binary, sometimes it’s situationally appropriate, sometimes it’s not, sometimes it’s in between.

            • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 days ago

              Right… we’re all here in this thread because Joe Rogan says we should say the word. That it’s good for our culture. I’m suggesting that we probably shouldn’t say the word. That it’s bad for our culture.

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                13 days ago

                i don’t even necessarily disagree with that argument. I just don’t think it’s really all that relevant. I’m not even sure most people would disagree with it.

                Obviously you should be nice to people, you probably shouldn’t be an asshole, and you should help them as much as possible, but like, how many of us actually do that?

                It’s sort of like telling someone who smokes, that it’s bad for them, they know, you don’t need to remind them.

                • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  It’s sort of like telling someone who smokes, that it’s bad for them, they know, you don’t need to remind them.

                  If a famous celebrity tells people that smoking is good for them, should that go unchallenged?

                  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    that’s factually incorrect and misinformation, so yes, it should be challenged.

                    I’m not saying that the word retard is a good thing for society though.

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      13 days ago

      Maybe try to come up with a more creative way to insult people than by using a slur?

      This is the same logic behind saying the f-slur is okay if you’re not using it to describe gay people, you’re just using it to insult a straight person… by comparing them to gay people. See the problem?

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          No, because I’m not calling anybody a removed.

          Just so you know. (I’m guessing you weren’t removing it yourself for a joke.)

        • missingno@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          Reclaiming a slur to describe oneself is a very, very different matter from using it to insult others.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            i dont always use it to insult others, and nothing would stop me from using the f slur with my friend group either, gay or not.

            You could make the argument that it is offensive to use the word, but that’s kind of the point. (not to any specific group of people though)

      • LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        I don’t understand how so many people fail to see what you’re saying and have downvoted your comment so much. I think it’s a lot of millennials (I’m one) who have funny memories growing up calling things retarded and gay and they’re just… unwilling to give it up now. It’s not that hard to use other words.

        • missingno@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          It’s honestly very disappointing to see this here on Lemmy. I’d expect this from Reddit, but I thought people here were better than this.

          • TXL@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Yes. This place and this post in particular is in dire need of mod action.

          • LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            I agree. It’s all emotional and irrational. Even if you’re making a good point, you get downvoted because it’s an emotional response. Similarly, someone saying something stupid but in line with the general sentiment gets upvoted. Sucks to see it here.