GOP are better on Ukraine than the Democrats are, at least admitting the reality of the situation - that it was a proxy war they lost and they now need to extract themselves from it. Democrats are still in kookoo land on this subject.
So if we’re calling both American ruling parties support for a genocidal ethnostate a wash, since they both do it equally, and arbitrarily picking other topics instead why don’t we use this criteria to argue the GOP are the “harm reduction” candidates since they won’t zealously lead us into WW3 and nuclear war?
(I am not advocating voting for the GOP, just using an example to show you the flaw in your logic here)
GOP are better on Ukraine than the Democrats are, at least admitting the reality of the situation - that it was a proxy war they lost and they now need to extract themselves from it. Democrats are still in kookoo land on this subject.
So if we’re calling both American ruling parties support for a genocidal ethnostate a wash, since they both do it equally, and arbitrarily picking other topics instead why don’t we use this criteria to argue the GOP are the “harm reduction” candidates since they won’t zealously lead us into WW3 and nuclear war?
(I am not advocating voting for the GOP, just using an example to show you the flaw in your logic here)