Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 24 days agoRed Hat Enterprise Linux and Rocky Linux Embrace RISC-Vnews.itsfoss.comexternal-linkmessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up178arrow-down10
arrow-up178arrow-down1external-linkRed Hat Enterprise Linux and Rocky Linux Embrace RISC-Vnews.itsfoss.comSunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 24 days agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·24 days ago I do understand they are very important in Business So is Ubuntu, which is only a side-step away from Debian. But, while I hate dpkg, at least Debian is ethically clean.
minus-squareLeFantome@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·24 days agoNot according to the Free Software Foundation. Also, Red Hat contributes more GPL code than Debian does.
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·24 days agoRedhat, for at least a decade, has focused on services, with which I already said I have no issue. I haven’t seen or heard of anyone paying for Redhat just to get a base imagine with no support.
minus-squareLeFantome@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 days agoServices like stability, testing, compatibility, security, certification, and documentation?
So is Ubuntu, which is only a side-step away from Debian. But, while I hate dpkg, at least Debian is ethically clean.
Not according to the Free Software Foundation.
Also, Red Hat contributes more GPL code than Debian does.
Redhat, for at least a decade, has focused on services, with which I already said I have no issue. I haven’t seen or heard of anyone paying for Redhat just to get a base imagine with no support.
Services like stability, testing, compatibility, security, certification, and documentation?