Obviously we all want to avoid enshittified (aggressively monetized) software or at least get our money’s worth. I’m looking at self-hosting software right now and one I’m looking has a pricing page but only for cloud (no other paywalled features) and is open source. I tried looking up future plans and didn’t find much, so it doesn’t seem like it will enshittify. (not related) I had thought about switching to Omnivore for a long time but then they merged with ElevenLabs and the rest is history.

  • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Your good if:

    • It’s self-hosted and open source
    • It’s self-hosted and closed source, but doesn’t require online check in ( the DAW Reaper, for example)

    It’s a toss up if:

    • It’s self-hosted and closed source, and requires online check in.
    • It’s self-hosted and closed source, and requires a constant internet connection
    • It’s cloud, but open source. (you can generally self-host in this instance)

    And you’re screwed if:

    • It’s cloud and closed source.

    Self hosted in this instance means anything that installs and runs completely locally or on your own personal servers. If someone else’s servers are required I would count it as cloud. Phone apps generally count as “cloud” in this instance.

    • ChristopherA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I’d agree with the exception of Rocket.Chat. I hosted an instance for years. Over that time, basic features kept slipping behind a paywall despite being “open source,” and fully self hosted. It’s fully nagware at this point.

      I had my whole group of friends and family jump to Matrix a year ago. Instead of basic features becoming paid features… there are no features!

      Edit: I re-read your comment. Yes, RC “requires check-in.” My bad.

        • ChristopherA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That might work for a while, but running out of date software seems like a bad idea.

          • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Generally speaking, you’re not wrong. But I’d say it also depends on the use case and your threat environment. If it’s not publicly exposed, I’m generally OK with running an older version of software. In the case of chat software, for instance, it would have to be available only on local network or a private VPN like Tailscale. That can limit its usefulness though.