There’s no need for anyone to tell anyone anything.
The rich shitweasels who own one media conglomerate have enough common interests with the rich shitweasels who own another media conglomerate that they tend to arrive at more or less the same decisions and same policies even if they do so wholly and completely separately.
That’s generally the case broadly too - not just in this instance, or even just regarding media conglomerates.
Why do you think that is? Has someone told them to back off? Who?
There’s no need for anyone to tell anyone anything.
The rich shitweasels who own one media conglomerate have enough common interests with the rich shitweasels who own another media conglomerate that they tend to arrive at more or less the same decisions and same policies even if they do so wholly and completely separately.
That’s generally the case broadly too - not just in this instance, or even just regarding media conglomerates.