Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agoFraudsh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1622arrow-down19
arrow-up1613arrow-down1external-linkFraudsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoThere are more then one species of tigers though, so the tiger average should be lower. I’m not able to tell what species is pictured there though - if it is siberian, then ok, pretend I didn’t say a word.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoThere are also a couple subspecies of leo but I stated in my comment “assume optimal condition”.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoOk, if optimal condition means optimal species :)
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI think you’ll agree that a 300 lbs tiger is not the optimal subspecies for a large cat deathmatch. It’s very much suboptimal, yes.
There are more then one species of tigers though, so the tiger average should be lower. I’m not able to tell what species is pictured there though - if it is siberian, then ok, pretend I didn’t say a word.
There are also a couple subspecies of leo but I stated in my comment “assume optimal condition”.
Ok, if optimal condition means optimal species :)
I think you’ll agree that a 300 lbs tiger is not the optimal subspecies for a large cat deathmatch. It’s very much suboptimal, yes.