octopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoFacepalm on multiple levelslemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square130linkfedilinkarrow-up1976arrow-down112
arrow-up1964arrow-down1external-linkFacepalm on multiple levelslemmy.mloctopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square130linkfedilink
minus-squareoctopus_ink@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·2 years agoI think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
minus-squareCyrus Draegur@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·2 years agoExactly. “they can’t do that that’s illegal” Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES
I think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
Exactly.
“they can’t do that that’s illegal”
Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES