• A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In case anyone had the same kneejerk reaction: no, this is not about privacy etc. Just performance, according to OOP.

    Still, this reads like a reaction to a recent overblown debacle.

    edit: no, it actually does say “hardened security” in the README, lol, but the whole project seems to boil down to some compiler flags.

    • wondrous_strange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly, OOP should’ve broadcast that fact. It is a lot easier sell than letting people think they changed the code somehow.

      Not sure why they are trying to show it as a seperate project.