Hah, and well he should!
I was trying to convey that the implication runs the other way, i.e. that because he is delivering current, accurate information (and is honest about his perspective), that he is trustworthy.
Hah, and well he should!
I was trying to convey that the implication runs the other way, i.e. that because he is delivering current, accurate information (and is honest about his perspective), that he is trustworthy.
I think there’s an even simpler explanation: political debt to Jeff Yass (15% tiktok owner) and his cash for the 2024 campaign.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/donald-trump-jeff-yass
Thanks, even an episode I’ve already listened to!
I also consider Robert trustworthy, maybe because he’s honest about his perspective.
Got some sauce for that? I’d genuinely like to read about that particular angle.
Well, Trump got a lot more from the guy who has a 15% stake in the company during the election.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/donald-trump-jeff-yass