

If you’re so sensitive to being corrected the easy way to avoid it is to simply not create misinformation in the first place.
If you’re so sensitive to being corrected the easy way to avoid it is to simply not create misinformation in the first place.
EZ. Your original totally incorrect comment that you’re trying to pretend didn’t mean what it obviously meant.
You’d have to design hardware specifically that’s compatible with Linux
You don’t have to design hardware you have to write drivers.
It’s OK to admit you’re wrong.
You’re just embarrassing yourself at this point.
The cool thing is that since it is correct there is no barrier to vanilla wine using it, and stuff running well in vanilla wine instead of requiring proton’s hijinks is cool.
The only thing that is lacking for compatibility is drivers. If that’s what you meant you should have said so instead of saying hardware needs to be designed. If that’s not what you meant then you don’t know what you’re talking about.
You’d have to design hardware specifically that’s compatible with Linux
What makes you think that?
I wouldn’t assume that Java is only half as fast as C for every workload. It’s probably a lot closer than you think in a lot of real world scenarios.
Already out again!
Everything that you said is correct, except the prevalence of the career advice. I would bet most people looking for their first job out of school don’t even know COBOL is a language.
I wouldn’t necessarily agree it needs to be rewritten. Hiring programmers that are willing to work in cobol would certainly be harder than other languages though, because you’ll have a much smaller candidate pool and people would be unlikely to see learning cobol as a good career investment
Java can be pretty damn efficient for long running processes because it optimizes at runtime. It also can use new hardware features (like cpu instructions) without having to compile for specific platforms so in practice it gets a boost there. Honestly, the worst thing about Java is the weird corporate ecosystem that produces factoryfactory and other overengineered esoteric weirdness. It can also do FFI with anything that can bind via c ABI so if some part of the program needed some hand optimized code like something from BLAS it could be done that way.
All that to say it doesn’t matter what language they use anyway, because rewriting from scratch with a short timeline is an insane thing to do that never works.
So we’re teaching the children that only high level art is worthwhile and they shouldn’t even try to make at themselves because they suck at it and you can just generate it. Cool.
More like he was one person in a company and gets all the credit because society can’t fathom that anybody other than the leech on top has the impact they really do
Pretty sure Apple just packaged shit other companies made with extraordinary marketing. Like the ipod circle everybody went nuts for they settled a lawsuit with creative because of patent infringement. I actually had a creative zen and loved it because it didn’t have Apple software trying to control my music library.
Every single one of these flows from wealth inequality.
The status quo vs … gestures wildly ???
I’m those cases isn’t it because they had separate hardware built in for backwards compat? This is more of a PC style hardware upgrade rather than totally different hardware (compute wise) so it might be different for that reason?
Lol that’s not a false equivalency. You don’t get to just decide words mean things they don’t because it sounds nice in your head.