Conservative makes no sense. It’s not changing for the sake of lot changing.

I agree with this part completely.

Liberalism is the same, it’s change for changes sake.

Where is this coming from though?

Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property and equality before the law. — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

It doesn’t have anything to do with randomly changing stuff just for change’s sake.

To be fair, we can look at the Wikipedia definition for conservatism too and see if there’s a more charitable way to interpret it:

Conservatism is a cultural, social, and political philosophy that seeks to promote and to preserve traditional institutions, practices, and values. — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatism

I’d say the answer is basically no: this is just an indirect way to say “appeal to tradition fallacy”.

Not really on topic but content warnings like that are really appreciated.

Also, ChatGPT 4 came out but is still only available to people who pay (as far as I know). So using ChatGPT 3 feels like only having access to the leftovers. When it first came out, that was exciting because it felt like progress was going to be rapid, but instead it stagnated. (Luckily interesting LLM stuff is still happening, it’s just nothing to do with OpenAI.)