• 1 Post
  • 103 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 15th, 2024

help-circle
  • Are you trying to imply doubling the available workforce is not good? Its usually a good thing.

    Women not being forced to do the reproductive labour in the family? Good.

    Families being coerced into having two incomes to make ends meet, meaning they don’t get as much time with their children as they like? Bad.




  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.nettolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldthe perfect browser
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    Here’s the wikipedia definition

    Plagiarism is the representation of another person’s language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one’s own original work.

    So, I’m afraid that my definition is closer to consensus than yours.

    If word gets out that you used a ghostwriter, you’re gonna get in trouble for plagiarism. That’s the thing they’ll accuse you of.

    While consent is a part of why plagiarism is shitty, it’s not what makes something plagiarism. You can check it the other way around: if I’m legitimately quoting someone, do I need explicit consent, or is it implied (if it’s published work)?

    About the BSD stuff: yeah, it might not be illegal and consential, but both of these things aren’t necessary for plagiarism.


  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.nettolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldthe perfect browser
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    What are you talking about? I’ve given you several examples of plagiarism outside of a legal concept, which means that there are non-legalistic definitions.

    Here’s another one: copying someone’s homework is plagiarism. It’s not illegal, though.

    I’d argue that most acts of plagiarism are actually legal, but can result in getting your title revoked. That’s not because of an IP law violation, since you don’t have ownership of an argument in an academic text.

    Letting a ghostwriter write an academic paper is plagiarism, too, btw. How would that make sense in an IP law context, if the ghost writer not obtaining the IP is the whole point?





  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.nettolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldthe perfect browser
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    There’s more than a legal definition of plagiarism.

    Plagiarism is when you sell the work of others as your own without attribution. There are bucketloads of examples of legal plagiarism.

    I’m pretty sure that everything H. Bomberguy discussed in his plagiarism video was legal, for example.







  • You can also just download any binary file you find online and run it. Or use any install.sh script you happen to find anywhere.

    Package managers are simply a convenient offer to manage packages with their dynamically linked libraries and keep them up to date (important for security). But it’s still just an offer.



  • Then you highlight why AI Safety is important by linking a blog post about the dangers of poorly thought-out AI systems

    Have you read the article? it clearly states the difference of AI safety vs AI ethics and argues why the formerare quacks and the latter is ignored.

    If you read AI Safety trolley problems and think they are warning you about an ai god, you misunderstood the purpose of the discussion.

    Have you encountered what Sam Altman or Elsevier Yudkowsky claim about AI safety? It’s literally “AI might make humanity go extinct” shit.

    The fear mongering Sam Altman is doing is a sales tactic. That’s the hypeman part.