data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fe61/5fe61077d1ec81add871a73f1c4dd84e2434f9c0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/098bc/098bccdc5e7eabe662da9cf2d6d9afed00bd3eca" alt=""
Use their good will until then and there won’t be an easy way to implement gun control against the left. Fucking red flag laws might be weaponized, but nobody pays attention until fucky laws are pointed at them.
Use their good will until then and there won’t be an easy way to implement gun control against the left. Fucking red flag laws might be weaponized, but nobody pays attention until fucky laws are pointed at them.
This is such a “rights for me but not for thee” take. Dismiss anyone you disagree with while only valuing your own feelings.
Everyone has a right to defend themselves, their family and their community.
I haven’t met many pro-2A peeps that are against the left or minorities owning firearms. Most seem to loudly support it, actually. Taking responsibility for your own safety is generally a good idea.
They’d be using laws requiring equal treatment of protected classes most likely.
You’re the only person that both cares and can actually take responsibility for your own safety.
Kill some people if you are actually in danger. -Americans
Pointing out your wanton violation of language isn’t pearl clutching.
If your use of the word warlord is equivocated to all hell like your other vocab choices our warlord might be a janitor or some shit, so it’s hard to say.
Edit: also, merry christmas. I hope the holiday season has been well :)
A CEO is a position, not a person. Killing him isn’t any sort of defense when he isn’t actively endangering others.
It’s murder, even if it’s justified. Stop these idiotic word games. They only weaken your position.
From what? Most of the attacks against him come from behind him.