While I agree that the response is heavily AI generated, I have to disagree that he’s pro-Maga. He reached out to both democrats and republicans to talk about the importance of privacy and the democrats turned him down (or entirely ignored him) while the republicans met with him.
He then went on Xitter to shame the Dems and said that the Republicans seemed to be the party caring about privacy.
He’s definitely a dumbass for trying to play it that way, but he did not come out in support of Maga.
They admitted they were wrong, what corrective action will they take?
Their response sounds like what AI would say when it’s called out.
They should do better and they should make public what they’ll do so it won’t happen again
Israeli actually, like express VPN
Sure, and he said that he’s going to show them his vision, allay their fears, and change their minds, right?
I’m sorry, can you explain the issue of him acknowledging the lived experiences of people?
Do you have an actual example instead of platitudes?
Do you want privacy or none of the technology features?
Many tech features come built in and you may be able to turn them off individually in the car settings, though probably not all features if they’re related to safety.
If you’re worried about privacy and the car phoning home, then that’s a different topic.
Check the privacy laws in your country. If in Europe, you can have the services disconnected. Looks like a Renault so sometimes cars manufactured in the EU will come built in with the ability to turn off the feature.
Car data privacy is the worst there is today and will get much worse with timd. Mozilla foundation put out a report recently
What’s your threat model and what do you want the AI to do?
Does it need an internet connection? Do you have to use a service rather than the dataset/model? Do you have a machine powerful enough to run it locally? Is it for work or personal use? Why do you have to create an account to use your work’s Claude subscription?
Don’t fall for the hasbara that Israel spreads.
Hamas is only one of many resistance groups in Gaza. And the ideologies range massively from far left to far right. It’s how they’re able to sustain a prolonged resistance against Israel’s constant aggression.
Focusing on Hamas’s leadership - they have been mostly centrist and advocate for equal rights of all, with outliers that are more right wing and Israel repeatedly kills off the moderates in the party for a reason. Israel wants the hardwingers to be more prominent. Israel even wanted to bring back Ahmedenijad as president of Iran and that guy is the poster child of “death to the infidels”.
You’re also equating Palestinians with Hamas too, don’t do that.
The working class struggle and the genocide are the same struggle.
The context of the post and comment are about liberal zionism, and the extended context is that a liberal zionist is just as bad as a fascist, which is true. The big common denominator (amongst many other things) being genocide.
Israel has been largely headed by liberal zionists for the majority of it’s genocidal colonial history so far. It’s only recently that the rightwing have gained the majority they enjoy now. And they both agree on the genocide, just differ on the optics and language used.
I think you misspelled “genocide”
Did I miss something about Zohran?
Signal mentioned that their apps were best for security and a web browser had too many vulnerabilities that they couldn’t guarantee.
They prefer to manage their own apps - a signal desktop app being one of them.
True, until VPNs are also banned (like some US states are doing). One anti-privacy law passed will bring up another, then another, then another.
Smear campaign or hyperbolic criticism? It’s the age of outrage after all. But I also think Proton should be doing way better in general and are not above criticism.