So… the headline answered the question and people still read the article?

We don’t. It was sarcasm.

“Criminal prosecution” requires a system of law. However the lawless dictator that overthrew the throne has no intention of acknowledging that there is a system of law in place that doesn’t benefit him directly.

So, this could end poorly.

Just when I tink I’ve heard the last of this parasite, I now have to hear how he gets scrotebloat from his sister?

Seriously though… is this shit real?

This guy Souls.

It doesn’t take a scholar to say that.

.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Look, I get your need to save some face here, and I’ll even allow for the fact that in the effort to do so- some cringe is going to seep out-

But I really think it’s best for all involved that we end this here. I just don’t see you recovering from this and I’m only getting more and more embarrassed as the picture that is you- slowly comes into focus; comment by comment, cringe by cringe.

And I just don’t really want to know you that well.

So, have a day, and take care.

If you’re lucky, PizzaCake will make a comic victimizing you in solidarity!

Fingers crossed!

Such cringe.

So I double-checked, and it looks to me like you are the one that invited yourself to this discussion with some white knight contrarian nonsense in defense of-

*checks notes,

a throw away web comic posted by a complete stranger on the internet.

So…. I’m not sure you want I be accusing me of “debate bro” shenanigans.

Because, from here, it seems you just can’t help yourself from responding. Trust me… bro. It’s easy to just…. Not. Go ahead and give it a try.

All you have to do, is just walk away.

“We”? So, are you the self-appointed representative of just this community, or lemmy as a whole?

Considering the source, I’m calling bullshit.

I would gold this comment if I could!

What I posted is what we like to call illustrative sarcasm.

And what is funny is that you think my illustrating your bad joke is a representation of what bothers me without ever having known who I am or what I’m about.

lol

I basically made you illustrate the argument against her by your own example.

I judge her on what she has said and done. You’ve judged me on who you need me to be so your opinion appears to be valid.

It’s Morgan Freeman for me.

So you honestly think people who can’t stand her, subscribe to her OF?

Do you spend a lot of time on Fox News? What about Teslas? Do you have one? No? Big fan of Christianity? No? Well, that MUST mean you go to church! Right?

Where do you people find this broken logic?