Tar_Alcaran

I have a friend who has wireless everything, and bragged he even had a wifi coffee maker.

So when I asked him for coffee, he walked to the kitchen, grabbed a cup, but it under the coffee maker, walked back, fidgeted with his phone while showing me how cool it was, walked to the coffee maker, got the cup, came back and handed it to me.

He did appreciate me asking about wireless mugs.

Everything is in an offline VLan

This is the way.

I don’t need ANYONE to control my house when not in my house, and if that means I don’t get to either, then oh well.

π = 1
3! = 10

And in Xena: warrior princess, a wizard did it.

I’ve got a chemistry degree and I do reenactment and how average people lived throughout history is a big hobby of mine.

Media hurts me so much.

It’s trained on reality, not the feelings of conservatives

At least Florida has trees, though.

For now

This sounds WAY too dangerous. Better just tape a sign to your gun, the American Way!

If I had to explain some of my in-group chats, it would be complicated and awkward, but not life-destroying.

They also have the second least reliable military in NATO.

They should immediately change them back. Fuck Turkey. It’s not like you can get kicked out, which is why Turkey is still in.

Well that, and they’re the only way into the black sea

“an unfortunate and voluntary relocation”, according to Turkey.

But everyone else can summarize in a single word, it starts with a G

Well, there’s the human rights violations, the denial of the genocide they committed, the complete tyrant that’s ruining their country…

I’d be amazed if 10% of reddit mods were women, honestly.

The mother can, at any point in time, choose not to let someone else use her body. Doing so, practically, in all your examples would result in the birth of the child.

This isn’t some clever gotcha, the point of my argument is that the child has no right to use the mothers body to survive. If someone decides not to let someone else use their body, and that means the child dies, then so be it, because bodily autonomy supercedes life.

My argument isn’t that a mother should be able to kill a child just because she feels like it. It’s acceptable to kill someone to maintain bodily autonomy, that’s my argument.

Your “clever” examples all have options where both bodily autonomy are maintained AND life is maintained, which is a double win.

Best I can do is “ET” for the Atari 2600

Yeah, things have hugely improved in Gaza since one of the most powerful countries in the world got rid of their “democrats” in government.

Ohnowaititstheopposite.

Morality is subjective and many different systems exist.

However, mine is the best one because it leads to optimal human welfare and happiness. If you can show your system is better, I’ll happily change my mind, but until that time, if you follow a system that doesn’t lead to optimal human welfare and happiness, you are, thus, intentionall working against it, and are a thus a monster.

I’m someone else, but yeah, I believe the right to bodily autonomy trumps quite literally every other right.

If the world’s smartest person’s survival depended on compromising my bodily autonomy for 5 seconds, I would be in my right to let that person die. If you forced it on me, I would be in my right to kill the world’s smartest person for violating my bodily autonomy.

And not just that, but I think the vast majority of people hold this opinion, but they’re either too dumb to realize it, or commit non-stop special pleading to deny it. I think that very basically, because to think bodily autonomy is NOT the ultimate right, is to think it acceptable to farm human organs as long as it’s for a sufficiently good reason.

Dad could teach their child to cook though