A human being from a Finland.
I’d like to clarify here that Voyager can do with PieFed everything it can do with Lemmy. But PieFed has a lot more features than Lemmy does, and of those extra features, Voyager supports none. But that only means that the PieFed experience on Voyager is precisely the same as the Lemmy experience on Voyager!
PieFed and mBin exist. Both do everything Lemmy does, and a bit more. They use less resources as well. What reason would there be for forking Lemmy? The only reason Lemmy is the most popular one among these is that it was the first one. Since then, better things have surfaced.
PieFed is essentially what OP means. It exists, it does everything Lemmy does, and a bit more. And it does it faster, both for the user and for server resources.
Then probably something else will be funded in the same amount. That will be either PieFed or mBin.
PieFed has this out of the box. You click a link at your home instance once on the browser you use. After that, you can get from any post on an unknown instance to yours by adding a few letters in the front of the URL on that browser.
Would you be able to elaborate on this, maybe?
Oho, I would not have expected this comment to get downvoted. Anyone able to explain why? It’s now received one upvote and two downvotes. What is wrong about the comment? When I’m as surprised about something as now, it’s often a good chance to learn something!
Of course, but did your world history classes talk about racism? I’d guess that was a theme in the classes about your own country’s history, whichever country you happen to be from, but not really in world history.
You needed to be taught the basics of the two world wars, the concept of dark ages and renaissance, something about Roman empire probably, etc. And people from countries whose history doesn’t include noteworthy amounts of racism have to learn about the same amount about their country as you had to learn about yours, and have about the same amount of teaching time left for teaching the same things about world history that were taught to you.
It is implied in the article that the chatbot was able to point out details about the image that the reporter either could not immediately recognize without some kind of outside help or did not bother looking for.
So, the chatbot added making the reporter notice something on the photo in a few seconds that would have taken several minutes for the reporter to notice without aid of technology.
You can see my comment history to determine if I’m an LLM or not :)
In any case, have fun in your circles!
If the part of the image that reveals the image was made by an AI is obvious enough, why contact a specialist? Of course, reporters should absolutely be trained to spot such things with their bare eyes without something telling them specifically where to look. But still, once the reporter can already see what’s ridiculously wrong in the image, it would be waste of the specialist’s time to call them to come look at the image.
The article says they used ChatGPT or some similar LLM bot. It says they used a chatbot, and that’s what the word chatbot means by default. A skilled reporter mentions if it was something else.
The reporter used a chatbot such as ChatGPT to ask if there’s anything suspicious in the image, the chatbot, by coincidence, happened to point out something in the photo that the reporter could then recognise as AI-generated indeed, and got on typing his article again.
The only part of this that is not mentioned in the article is that the reporter confirmed the referred spot in the image with his own eyes, but that is such an integral part of a reporter’s education that you need specific reasons to work against the assumption that this was done.
There’s hoping that the reporter then looked at the image and noticed, “oh, true! That’s an obvious spot there!”
This helps only if you wash your towel after each shower.
They’re in the process of untangling it, though! if only they can convince the white car on the rightmost lane coming fromt he upper side of the picture to turn some 30° right, one of the directions will be able to move. Once all cars from that side of the city have passed the intersection, the ones coming from the lower right of the image can go. And once all of them have gone, maybe in a day or two, it’s the turn for the truck carrying liquid concrete to move onwards!
Norwegian is just Swedish with a somewhat hot potato in your mouth. Plus you need to be jumping up and down while speaking.
(And Danish is the same but with a scalding potato in your mouth, but no jumping.)
The picture is of American drivers, though.
Seems they do. That’s what the yellow markings on the road are for.
This lead me to wondering: Do the Fahrenheit people talk about sub-zero as well?!
I had never thought of that possibility. 0 degrees is just generally cold, but -17,778 degrees is already in the area of “seriously cold”.
Here’s PieFed’s “Donate” page: https://piefed.europe.pub/donate