This is obvious gaslighting

Garland pretended to build a case, with zero intention of every trying to prosecute it.

Where’s your proof that he only pretended to build a case?

There isn’t any. It’s a conspiracy theory.

What’s an example of Garland deferring to decorum?

Knowing full well decorum is not an option in organized crime.

It sounds like you’re saying Garland should’ve “gone rogue” or broken the law to take down Trump.

The same judicial system that gives Merrick Garland any authority has been corrupted with GOP picks that will rule in favor of Trump.

Merrick Garland has been working to build a case against Trump. Trump delayed the cases. How can Merrick Garland’s replacement stop Trump from delaying cases?

I thought the president didn’t have the power to do that. What could he do differently?