No there was actually something in there about avada kedavra being bad for the soul (or something like that), though I’m not sure if that specific bit applied just to the spell or to killing in general.

It’s making fun of people getting all worked up about their (extreme) idea of feminists. Usually, they’ll also picture these straw feminists as not wearing bras, so presumably they’re lurking at the training bra section to prey on young children about to get their first bra.

Staring straight into @[email protected] comics’ Galbor month.

Oh sorry, that might have been projecting - it’s what I want to believe.

That’s true. If they’re not, though, or if they’re easy to generate yourself, then you are kinda forced to pay attention though, if you care about the security of your project.

I don’t have the expertise or experience to say whether that is true. But GregKH seems to think so, and other prolific projects seem to be coming to the same conclusions.

I get that it’s attractive to think that AI isn’t capable of it. But it’s important that what you believe to be true is, and stays, based on reality rather than on what I wish is true. And it’s especially important to be wary of when you really want something to be true.

If these tools are indeed finding security issues, then ignoring them means someone else will find those issues - and abuse them.

It’s not so much that they’re blocking it, as it is that they’re not implementing it. In GNOME, as I understand it, the Emoji picker is implemented by the toolkit (GTK). That means that apps that don’t (fully) use that toolkit, such as Chrome and Firefox, will need to add the implementation themselves. That is now done for Firefox.

Yes, but that didn’t work in Firefox before this change. The whole point of this change is to make that work in Firefox as well. (Likewise, it still doesn’t work in Chrome, Chrome-based browsers, and Electron apps.)

So the situation in which this makes sense is when you’re using Gnome.

What would it mean for you to call it yourself? This change is just so that if you press Ctrl+. in Firefox, the native emoji picker shows up, so at least in that sense you’re invoking it yourself? (Before this change, Ctrl+. would do nothing in Firefox, even though it would show the emoji picker in normal GTK applications.)

I miss /u/PleaseRespectTables.

I downvote every comment that’s accusing something of being AI. Either it’s true, in which case the comment doesn’t change anything, or it’s false, in which case it’s hurtful. The upside is not worth the downside.

I want it to become a norm that accusing something of being AI is considered rude.

Might as well make it easy for people. I’m not too familiar, but I assume this is their website?

https://beetlemoses.bigcartel.com/preorder-my-debut-book-of-comics

https://mastodon.social/@MrLovenstein/114874448146053278

If only an AI had come up with this.

Thanks for being today’s explainsmbc.

Didn’t read to me like OP was arguing for a single alternative.

Ads featuring the slogan also occasionally featured men who would accidentally get into risqué positions whilst trying to get a Gaytime.

Heh, I had to look one of those up. Classic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKVdYZEfkNA

Well, good to know we weren’t the only ones with the racist names (feels like ages ago, but it wasn’t even that long ago). Schaumkuss makes sense though, they just changed them to the Dutch equivalent of “kuss” here.

Sounds like they’ve figured out how not to be reduced to their jobs!