jfc we are going to be stuck with “this looks slightly weird. is it AI?” articles til the end of time.

unsubscribe

Videos are allowed if “freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk”

oh it’s that easy huh. why didn’t we think of this before lol.

Discouraging use of artificial dye is a good idea. It interferes with people’s ability to make health conscious choices. Requiring labeling would be a great start.

Thing is they’re not banning all dyes, they want “natural” dyes used instead. But “natural” does not necessarily mean better or safer.

Food dye is used to cover up a lot of food crime.

source? i did a brief search but didn’t see anything about it.

Most of us wouldn’t eat food that needs to be dyed to look safe to eat, if it weren’t dyed, if we had a choice.

You can look at it from a different angle. If there’s nothing actually wrong with the food other than appearance, then food dye prevents food waste.

also:

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/why-did-the-fda-ban-red-dye-3/

There is a deeper political issue here as well that I will not get into, but just point out. The recent Supreme Court decision ending Chevron Deference may have played a role here. The question is – who interprets federal regulations? The Chevron Deference standard says that the experts working in the relevant agency would be given deference when interpreting the law. For example, the FDA could determine how to apply the Delaney Clause based upon an expert level understanding of the complexities of toxicity research. The SC ended such deference, meaning that regulations can be interpreted by the courts without deference to experts. One has to wonder if this otherwise odd decision by the FDA was a response to this.

setting the precedent to remove expert opinion of federal law and replace it with court opinion is not good.

dude seriously you need to chill.

okay ¯_(ツ)_/¯

i mean yes, but this is a more dynamic transperency that reacts more to backgrounds, merging/separating with other elements, etc.

jfc relax. it’s a number.

what would you have them do? anything else would be just as arbitrary.

it’s not that unusual, lots of software is named by the date. i think it makes a lot of sense especailly for apple, now they don’t have a different release number for all their different platforms.

and?

note: do not attempt if you’re a chiropractor

coincidentally we also ruined our web app.

the real turing test.

i think you are misunderstanding the point of the no preorder movement. There never should have been an expectation for it to improve the Day 1 quality of game releases.

The main benefit of not preordering is consumer protection, so we can judge a game’s quality after people who we trust have played and review it. That protection is worth more than whatever paltry nonsense publishers bundle with preorders.

the principle applies to literally all games anyway, but the youtuber almost certainly did that to get clicks.

but now you get special armor that’s relevant for a whole 10 minutes of game time.

for example, say you are waiting to make a left turn, it would be nice to know if oncoming cars are braking or not. if they are stopped and you see their brake lights turning off, you can judge if you should hurry up or not turn at all.

and honestly i have the same problem with that intended use. it often looks like a stopped car is attempting to turn out into traffic. IMO emergency lights should have a faster blink pattern or something to differentiate from turn signals.

okay, pick a different color then. it’s a solvable problem.