• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • You don’t understand. This is tech tribal war.

    “Big Tech” is Apple, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI and Meta. Companies which were fully allied with the Democrats, and which were king of the tech hill until now.

    Musk, Thiel and Ellison (Tesla, Palantir and Oracle) are allied with Trump. Lets call them “Tech B”.

    Vance is doing code speak for: Tech B is gonna break Big Tech up and take top spot.

    And Big Tech knows this, which is why they are scrambling to get into Trumps good graces and trying to get Trump on their side.

    They have more money and influence right now and they are trying to leverage that to keep top spot.

    And Trump is just letting the two teams bid up each other for his favour.


  • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksYep
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I fully agree and in typical American fashion, affirmative action and DEI were just bandaids to quickly solve some of the effects of institutional discrimination, instead of solving it at the root.

    Even I, as a very progressive person, don’t like some DEI hires. But the actual problematic DEI hires are not talented people like Kamala Harris. They are connected incompetent people.

    I think Clarence Thomas would be a good example. By most accounts he is the most corrupt and incompetent justice, who just happened to run in the right conservative circles.

    In the business world, I also see quite a lot of well-connected incompetent people. It used to be white gulf buddies, now it tends to be the white sister-of, or the latina wife-of, the gulf buddy.

    Maybe the Trump kids are the best example of DEI hires. Ivanka Trump, anyone?


  • Extra funds are only useful if they can provide a competitive advantage.

    Otherwise those investments will not have a positive ROI.

    The case until now was built on the premise that US tech was years ahead and that AI had a strong moat due to high computer requirements for AI.

    We now know that that isn’t true.

    If high compute enables a significant improvement in AI, then that old case could become true again. But the prospects of such a reality happening and staying just got a big hit.

    I think we are in for a dot-com type bubble burst, but it will take a few weeks to see if that’s gonna happen or not.