This isn’t “I want to believe”, this is “it would be irresponsible to not consider”.
One of many.
That’s what the text of the article says.
But for some reason the clip that they put with it is Elon talking about birth rates.
The text in the title of the clip matches the article text, but the content doesn’t.
The thumbnail for this post is from the birthrate clip.
I’d say that docker compose also has the containers strapped together with holes cut in the walls between them for communication.
Kubernetes is more the crane that stacks the containers onto passing ships instead of a singular ship itself.
From the linked reference:
Avoid instantiating an object just to call getClass() on it; use the .class public member instead.
deleted by creator
Is that how we’ll annex Canada? Get the crown to hand it over as dowry for our reentry to the Old Dominion?
Secret, but fun!
Thank you.
I think it hurts me because the same type of liberal centrist thought saying Trump is “weird” has also outgrouped me as “weird” in a way that has materially destroyed my life and career.
We need to empathize, not outgroup.
Weird is a compliment. It means you are willing to be yourself in the face of broken societal standards.
Someone who wants to take the rights of others isn’t weird. The word you’re looking for is “evil” or “selfish” or “authoritarian”.
I did vote for the dems.
“Weird” as an insult is fundamentally pro-centrist and pro-status-quo.
I’m not opposed to pushback.
I’m opposed to pushback that also pushes out queers and anyone that doesn’t match the corporate/centrist definition of normal.
Pushback against the nazis, not against “weird”.
Be weird and proud.
Why are you proposing that we be as nice as possible to fascists?
I’m sure I’m not alone. America is a very pro-weird place.
It alienated me and others like me that identify as weird.
You can’t win the left while shit talking non-hegemonic personalities and preferences.
No, Clinton-era thinking is trying to fluster the Republicans without being concerned with alienating the voters.
It alienated me.
Most queer people identify with the label “weird”.
I also saw pro-corporate outlets praising it.
Just because it flustered republicans doesn’t mean it didn’t alienate voters.
I agree with the rest of your message listing progressive policies that the majority of Americans support. That’s the winning strategy.
“Weird” alienated voters. It’s an example of bad messaging that the dems doubled down on that made them lose.
They lacked a platform that promised anything but more of the same that Americans were tired of. They needed to present something new and hopeful, not just lob an insult that much of America identifies with. A suite of policies to help the working class attracts votes to your side. Calling your opponents weird attracts votes to the weird anti-establishment.
Weird plays into the republican’s hands, and it annoys the hell out of me how the dems decided to throw the election to focus on petty insults that come off as compliments to most observers.
A part of the problem is that they didn’t hold back on broken and alienating messaging like “weird”. They should have focused on talking about what they can do for the people.
That’s from the article text. In the interview, she described his reaction as asking her to “fix it”.
So she thinks she got the job by being the person able to convince Trump that he lost in 2020 by giving him hope to win in 2024.