You’re like 20 hours after someone already said that.

This isn’t Southern California media wtf, mate!

Oh so it’s a really fucking stupid joke, based on noting but a name in the article

Wtf is this comment

Projecting much?

Because remember you need a Nazi and a tankie to agree with facts in order for it to be the real truth.

Sometimes reality doesn’t align with political views. Doesn’t mean it’s not facts

Because he’d do what about another country banning a privately owned website?

Eh?

Hahahahahaha

Fuck’em

But the pendant in me points out that the company didn’t change an internal policy for what they consider mental illness, just now theyre allowing hate speech “free* speech”

Now I wonder if that would pass muster as a legal argument - meta doesn’t necessarily believe this as our policy, but we allow people to express their hate on this platform