Only reading the misleading headline?
Criticism of U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order intended to limit a program that forgives the federal student loans of borrowers who take public service jobs has grown since he signed it on Friday.
How does he pay for it if he’s broke?
You’re like 20 hours after someone already said that.
This isn’t Southern California media wtf, mate!
Oh so it’s a really fucking stupid joke, based on noting but a name in the article
Wtf is this comment
I think starting off so dismissive until later in the thread makes it seem very much like you don’t mostly agree and is more damaging to the idea
Projecting much?
Because remember you need a Nazi and a tankie to agree with facts in order for it to be the real truth.
Sometimes reality doesn’t align with political views. Doesn’t mean it’s not facts
Because he’d do what about another country banning a privately owned website?
Eh?
Hahahahahaha
Fuck’em
But the pendant in me points out that the company didn’t change an internal policy for what they consider mental illness, just now theyre allowing hate speech “free* speech”
Now I wonder if that would pass muster as a legal argument - meta doesn’t necessarily believe this as our policy, but we allow people to express their hate on this platform
Yeah I used old Reddit. I don’t want something that looks like new Reddit
Doesn’t even link anything but the title?
Butterfly deez jokes
That question is so specific it seems rhetorical
Butter fly deez nuts?
That’s not even clever. There’s no way anyone even laughed. Which is also why he’s so bitter and made up this story too probably
It’s too funny shit just works is abbreviated to sjw in this context
Oh no not someone who is such a nobody using his name in the title wouldn’t even generate a headline with buzz! 😕
Oh no not Jerry Pizza! Or whoever he was