I know this is pedantic, but that’s a cross, not a crucifix. The difference is that a crucifix has jesus on it.

I only mention this because I was hoping to see a bedazzled jesus corpse and was super disappointed.

This is so real, I swear to god. I joke about how neurotic I am about housework, and my house is always pristine, but still my worst nightmare is someone stopping by unexpectedly. My house can be spick and span and I’ll still apologize for the state of it.

Yeah because itain’t the front and itain’t the back

Holy shit. This is either really egregious ineptitude or intentional persecution of a political “enemy” of Trump’s. I’m not sure which because Halligan is so deeply unqualified for her position. Maybe it’s both.

We had Lace Bouquet:

Oh fuck I thought this was a bird’s-eye view of somebody’s head

I need to go to bed

Classic Wormantha.

Sephora has a boatload of products. $60 isn’t unheard of for some things like skincare, but a $60 highlighter is likely to be a luxury brand like Dior, Westman Atelier, Guerlain, or Prada. And the difference between those and less expensive highlighters is that you’re paying for the brand name. For $30-40 you can get a mid-tier highlighter like Nars, ABH, or Rare Beauty that will still be beautiful and probably has more product per dollar than the luxury brand does.

For example: the ABH Glow Seeker highlighter is $40 for 11 grams which equals $3.64 per gram

And the Dior Forever Glow highlighter is $60 for 6 grams which equals $10 per gram

People can spend their money how they want but personally I’d never pay $60 for a highlighter.

It looks like she’s at the store trying the tester. $60 for a highlighter is legit insane though.

Yes that’s a thing here in the US

Inextricably linked to “Lift Me Up” for me

If god had a name, what would we call him?

Spidersloth, spidersloth
Does whatever a spidersloth does

Hell yeah!

D’oh!

I cannot believe we’re wasting taxpayer dollars on a ballistic hoagie attack.

Ah, I see now - that’s a very good point!

If you re-read what I wrote, you’ll see that’s not at all what I’m saying. Regardless I’m done with this conversation because this:

I’m sorry to be pedantic

No you’re not.

is unnecessarily rude. Have a great day.

The person I was replying was “guaranteeing” that a 300lb person can lift at least 300lbs. I’m sure your father was strong but he was a professional gymnast. He’s an outlier. And genuinely, good for your dad - that’s great. But the vast majority of 300lb people aren’t super fit. They can’t all lift 300lbs and this is what I’m arguing. I’m not talking specifically about your dad, I’m replying to the other poster who was making a ridiculous generalization.