data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fe61/5fe61077d1ec81add871a73f1c4dd84e2434f9c0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/549ac/549aca4aa7ee4022dd6bf395b60d859fd9c47054" alt=""
Do you know of a provider is actually private? The few privacy policies I checked all had something like “We might keep some of your data for some time for anti-abuse or other reasons”…
Do you know of a provider is actually private? The few privacy policies I checked all had something like “We might keep some of your data for some time for anti-abuse or other reasons”…
Too bad that’s based on macros. A full preprocessor could require that all keywords and names in each scope form a prefix code, and then allow us to freely concatenate them.
I don’t think any kind of “poisoning” actually works. It’s well known by now that data quality is more important than data quantity, so nobody just feeds training data in indiscriminately. At best it would hamper some FOSS AI researchers that don’t have the resources to curate a dataset.
What makes these consumer-oriented models different is that that rather than being trained on raw data, they are trained on synthetic data from pre-existing models. That’s what the “Qwen” or “Llama” parts mean in the name. The 7B model is trained on synthetic data produced by Qwen, so it is effectively a compressed version of Qen. However, neither Qwen nor Llama can “reason,” they do not have an internal monologue.
You got that backwards. They’re other models - qwen or llama - fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by Deepseek-R1. Specifically, reasoning data, so that they can learn some of its reasoning ability.
But the base model - and so the base capability there - is that of the corresponding qwen or llama model. Calling them “Deepseek-R1-something” doesn’t change what they fundamentally are, it’s just marketing.
There are already other providers like Deepinfra offering DeepSeek. So while the the average person (like me) couldn’t run it themselves, they do have alternative options.
A server grade CPU with a lot of RAM and memory bandwidth would work reasonable well, and cost “only” ~$10k rather than 100k+…
To be fair, most people can’t actually self-host Deepseek, but there already are other providers offering API access to it.
An intelligence service monitors social media. They may as well have said, “The sky is blue.”
More interesting is,