Are we promoting incel ideology on lemmy? I’d rather have tankies.

Yes you can.

Classic European flavored racism. Are you aware that you are promoting racism or not? I think mindfulness is key here. People should consider their own internal biases and adjust to help make a better world.

You can very very active at age 52 if you maintain your health. Go to the gym and eat well now so you can avoid picking out a mobility scooter at age 52.

As a personal antidote, I would say that health is “free” up to age like 30. After age 30 you need to put some work in.

Strong recommend for learning the swipe motions. It takes a few min to learn but it’s free real-estate after that. And it’s faster. At least for me.

Buying books and totems and things would not be scams. You give money and get a thing. Same as a Christian buying a Christian book or cross or angel statue.

Prayers and magic in exchange for money are you giving money for nothing. Hallelujah would be in the money for nothing category.

I am a secular person. But at least at a Christian store you are getting the book/cross/thing you are paying for.

If you buy magic you get literally nothing.

I mean a broken clock is right twice a day. No one should be spending money on such nonsense. I’m not sure to call it a scam though. Is it a scam if you yourself are also a victim?

At least with adult content you are receiving what you pay for. When you are buying magic you literally are not getting what you paid for.

Even if you believe in magic it has never been shown to exist.

And the easy retort to that is that they don’t apply Chinese censorship globally. Only in China. Regional laws only apply regionally.

You do you. But I challenge you to go and look at gun prices at your local Walmart in the USA. Not every guy you buy has to be an FN-Scar 17 in pricing.

Turn around a look at how much it costs to defend yourself criminally in the USA.

Guns are about $200 at Walmart.

Robust criminal defense is about 30-40 hours.

Also good luck selling a gun you don’t have in your possession. Try going to a gun shop and saying “give me the cash now, I promise to give you the gun when the police give it back to me”

You might legally have that right but practically… good luck.

We do agree that you should be responsible for your actions. But looking at the meme here nothing wrong was done.

I mean they already own the guns. They can’t even sell them to hire a lawyer because they were taken.

If you can’t see the difference between buying one gun every x months and paying a lawyer 4 to 5 figures all in one go that’s on you.

Time is linear and you can’t sell what was taken from you. 🤷‍♀️

I mean you can buy a gun for 200 USD at Walmart. Lawyers cost 200 USD per hour.

It does not. No normal Linux distro installs updates without user consent. You can turn that feature on though if you like.

Exactly this. The people who designed secure boot and TPMs were not idiots. You can’t trick a properly set up TPM configured with secure boot in any realistic setup.

It won’t refuse to boot. It’s just that any automatic metric based decryption won’t work.

If you are using a TPM to automatically unlock luks and also manually removed the password backup before hand you could lose your data forever. That is true.

But if you kept the password based decryption stuff you could still manually unlock stuff. Just like secure boot was never there.

The difference would be that there could be no secure attestation that the kernel count trust/use without secure boot.

Like secure boot is really cool on Linux if you learn about it. Like sbctl alone is great for verifying backups and stuff.

I recommend reading through the arch wiki if you want to learn more. It covers a lot of stuff. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface/Secure_Boot

It won’t brick your system forever??? You just turn it off in your bios. Then you have no secure boot. Just like it was never there.

If you don’t care about boot chain attacks it isn’t bad at all.

If you do care about boot chain attacks it’s bad because it allows someone to replace things like the efi binaries, grub, or your kernel with backdoor-ed versions and there would be no way to detect this from the running system.

Secure boot checks for this stuff. You can read more here:

https://access.redhat.com/articles/5254641

You can but then you don’t have secure boot.

Bro. This is the fediverse. Don’t crap where you (we) live.

You can if you want to. But I don’t think that is best practice. The idea of quadlets is the bring Linux norms to containers. You contain and manage all permissions for that container in that user.

I personally have completely separated users and selinux mls contexts for each container group (formerly docker compose file) and I manage them thusly. It’s more annoying but it substantially more secure.

This being said I think you can do it as root. I think this might work but I am not certain sudo systemctl --user -M theuser@ status myunit.service