Why? Because we can identify propaganda like this very easily. You should consider the following basic questions when you are consuming news. What’s the publisher? Are they reliable? Do they have incentive to lie about this issue? Can we confirm anything that they claim in this article? Who are their sources? Do we know the names of their sources? Do we have any good reason to believe their sources?

In other words, this article doesn’t pass the five second test for reliability.

If you make a “no felons can be president” then you give state and local DAs the power to destroy someone’s election chances. That’s a dangerous proposition and I don’t support it, because you know Texas would start fucking with every decent future left-wing candidate.

On the other hand, if you’re suggesting that he should be behind bars already, and therefore ineligible for president on account of “he’s locked the fuck up right now”, I agree.

We did long ago. All of the prosecution for four years ago should have started 3.9 years ago, and it didn’t, and that was an active choice by DOJ leadership and Joe Biden.

(And screw them for doing that.)

We don’t need campaign insiders to tell us anything. We watched her do all the wrong things, just as any corporate democrat candidate would. It’s not like anything was a secret. If she wanted workers’ votes, all she had to do was actually push some decent policies.