Maybe they’re opening teeny tiny metal collectibles of some kind

I think in order for this to work, you would need to make it so that the server admins cannot see the contents of the communication. It wouldn’t work with public content

At that point, you might be better off using something like Matrix or a similar encrypted chat option.

If the other party doesn’t want to communicate with you, then what are you trying to achieve?

I think I’m missing something from your premise. Who are you trying to connect to in this case?

It’s more likely that some unfortunate new user will run this command, than any LLM. Especially because commands like this would be the first to be added to an LLM harness’ regex blacklist.

If you’re hosting it yourself, you wouldn’t be at the mercy of anyone else. You would get full control over your communication experience, along with any consequences that come along with that.

Is this a certain type of rabbit or is it normal to shave them while leaving a moustache?

To be fair, wikipedia does this too and I find it helpful. The problem is the color scheme

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey

My friend managed to find a compatible eraser at some stationery store while travelling, but he couldn’t tell me exactly which one he went to. This was before we could just order everything online, The best part was that you could use up the eraser a little bit to get a snug fit, you can’t do that with the yolks.

I don’t know why more stores didn’t carry those erasers

Why is this marked nsfw 😄

This deserves another post

If someone wants a guide

https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/threadiverse/how-to-block

Yea pretty much, it’s the same as old video games that had the sprite loop through an animation when you were standing still, instead of having the character freeze in place

If everything was still, I might as well be flipping through a PowerPoint

but I got a bad feeling that I might’ve looked like an enemy or something to them

I haven’t heard this phrasing before, what does it mean?

:(

As a Canadian, I do want to point out that it’s not enough to be above the united states, considering how their bar is dropping lower and lower.

I am very thankful for our existing healthcare system, and I want to see people protect it against the american inspired groups that are trying to privatize parts of it.

There are also areas where we were originally SUPPOSED to have coverage based on the original plan decades ago (ex. pharmaceuticals, homecare, dental), but those phases never got implemented.

Looked at the article, and it starts off pretty stupid

While everyone else seems to be slugging H20 from 40-ounce Stanley tumblers, I have never understood the appeal of drinking plain, tasteless water all day.

Some people live in areas where the water tastes bad, but seeing the water as “boring” might mean that you’re drinking too much of the other stuff (soft drinks, juice, sugary etc). It’s not that those other things are not hydrating, but they’re unhealthy for other reasons.

The question feels more pressing than ever given rising temperatures, heat waves

I refuse to normalize a world where people lack access to clean drinking water. 😠

The rest of the article is pretty standard advice. There’s no set amount of water that everyone needs to drink, and your diet/lifestyle/body composition/the weather will all play a role. Going based on thirst is a good indicator, but make sure you actually drink water when you’re thirsty. [email protected]

But using that to justify unequal access to clean drinking water is a big no.

NATO gold is reserved for the united states only, with trump as chief senior executive top general. No one else can attend those meetings

Everyone else gets put in NATO brass, and they need to meet regularly to show that they are on board with this new system.

It’s too big

Fair enough, some people prefer smaller phones

Too many stars

It’s overhyped? I didn’t know that, but good to know

Not enough aliens

?

Everything’s too far away

???

Oh

Are people here worshipping Dolly Parton? Seems like people are pointing out the good things that she has done, because that acknowledgement encourages others to do good too.

It’s fine to point out the bad things she’s done too, but I feel like you’re concerned about an issue that doesn’t really exist here

The thing is

• There are delusional leaders in democratic systems that build a cult of personality and market themselves as having been picked by God to lead, some even going to authoritarian lengths to cement their rule. The united states is currently one of those countries, and I think that is a far more dangerous thing to block from my country than Norway’s monarchy
• many monarchies are hereditary celebrities rather than hereditary leaders, where the position is kept around for the tourism value and they do not have (or claim to have) any right to rule over people

So when you make a comment saying that “they deserved it” about someone whose crime is being born into the spotlight, despite any good they may have done with that position, people are going to think you’re an uninformed jerk.