Most non-Mastodon “microblogging” software handles longer messages just fine. My Akkoma instance for example defaults to 5000 letters and there isn’t really a limit interface wise.
Admin on the slrpnk.net Lemmy instance.
He/Him or what ever you feel like.
XMPP: [email protected]
Avatar is an image of a baby octopus.
Most non-Mastodon “microblogging” software handles longer messages just fine. My Akkoma instance for example defaults to 5000 letters and there isn’t really a limit interface wise.
Maybe you should get checked for a stroke you had before already if you can’t parse regular English sentences 😏
Doesn’t seem to be what they are asking for, but I am also a bit confused about what exactly they are asking for.
No they are not end to end encrypted, but you can restrict access to subscribers only and if you self-host it, e2ee isn’t really needed.
For end to end encrypted photo sharing there are these two open source projects that also offer a for pay cloud storage:
The only Fediverse project that offers optional e2ee messages is Hubzilla afaik.
It wasn’t me who used a cringe party metaphor first 🤷♂️
Make sure you use a MariaDB or MySQL database. Despite what the (very incomplete) docu says, Postgres support is broken.
One thing about Cory’s books is that there is always some extremely cringe party section with some rather forced romance part screaming “how do you do fellow kids?” even to me, a middle aged guy himself.
The above is also cringe, even though the argument has some (limited) merit. Look, Cory… just admit some rich friend of yours talked you into signing up for this on the last silicon vally party you attended. We all make mistakes like that some time 🤷♂️
Apparently the official app has a few dependencies that themselves depend on Google Play services, hence being blocked for F-droid inclusion.
I was talking about Podman Pods. Sorry for not being clear.
Yeah, inside of Pods you can just use the container name and thus avoid hard-coding any IPs.
Oh, yeah. I am happy my effort to convince them worked out.
Not sure why you would need a seperate platform for such kind of videos though. You can use Mastodon etc. perfectly fine for this kind of stuff.
But I think that is not why the majority use TikTok. Tiktok is more like those TV channels that show an endless number of funny bloopers and cooking shows, and those need semi-professional makers and curators that want to be paid for their work.
I am not a Tiktok user, but everytime someone shares a video with me it is clearly made by someone that did it because they want to build a following and monetize their channel. I mean, why else spend a lot of effort to make such short form videos?
Most of the content on TikTok is created by people because they want to earn money with it. But most of it isn’t content which would make it possible to build up a supporter base through Patreon, OnlyFans etc. So where is the money going to come from to attract such content creators to a potential Fediverse TikTok alternative?
They can go somewhere else and talk to each other there.
Censorship means that some higher authority wants some information not to be seen by certain people. The target of censorship is therefore the readers/listeners and not primarily the person writing/speaking. Hence if the readers/listeners don’t actually want to read/hear the hateful drivel that some person shouts into the void, removing it isn’t censorship but content curation.
I think one reason has to do with digital sovereignty. Especially people in Europe are not happy with the dominance of US based social media sites and thus are more likely to invest time and effort into local alternatives. They are also more likely to be concerned about the near total lack of legal privacy protections in the US.
But what about Canadian spyware? 🤔