recentSlinky

He did :/

And still those levels of unreasonable and borderline stupid hate is a much better villain character and motivation than almost anything we get in media these days. Including the second half of reverse flash’s arc in the flash tv show!!!

I’d take that a step further and say they SHOULD NOT make profits at all. If it makes more money than it needs, lower the price and give the taxes back. Investments in improving public services shouldn’t be attached to the money it makes either. It should just be another part of the expenses regardless, and be a separate tax. Completely detach profits and making money from making everyone’s life better.

Yep, and they were like “holy shit, let’s go do something about it immediately!” Which is the opposite of not giving a fuck about it.

This is so stupid, i love it

If only the government officials knew the law ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Honestly, this doesn’t feel different to me than using the cross as a holy symbol for Christians. Both are very weird culty behaviours, but not much different. Although at least Christianity has the centuries long traditions, history, and international numbers to justify their behaviour. The tent thing without that context makes it extra weird.

Is “flays” the new “slam”?

And i think committing and/or assisting in genocides is ‘hostile activity’. One of us is definitely wrong :)

Didn’t they get sued multiple times for pulling shit like this before?

Me playing Satisfactory

Just fucking regulate data collection for fuck’s sake!!

But of course not as they Must keep on sucking the car and tech industries’ dicks or their throats will close or something.

Not play the devil’s advocate but China isn’t doing anything wrong (legally, not ethically) if they’re following the regulations of the country they operate in.

The answer is very easy unless you’re a whore for rich white dick.

It was my age when i found out toasted bread in a peanutbutter sandwich is much better than untoasted. I’d say that’s significant enough to be part of the ultimate answer.

No worries about that. Even if it does sour it, the shared interest of pedophilia will certainty improve the US-Saudi relations for sure ;)

But the other way around is totally fine? It’s okay to steal, but too much to return PART of what you stole?

Translation: their bribe isn’t enough to cover the trouble

Water is as wet as clothes are clothed.

It’s telling enough when you see fox segments that were supposedly made to demonize him and it’s things like “free child care for all, fare taxes for all, fare wages based on labor”.

I think they’re so up their asses that they completely forgot how regular people even think. Many of their attacks were basically advertising for his campaign lol.

Didn’t they get sued (by trump) and settle over doing this with the Harris interview? Can’t the precedent be used against them for doing it again to win another lawsuit against them very easily? Or couldn’t they use that precedent against trump to force the full interview as well?

I don’t know much about US law but this seems very legally sketchy to me. I guess kissing ass takes over the law in these cases.

And when one of the main ingredients is woke (science) will also mean they won’t be able to any time soon