

That other thread got weird and defensive real fast.
That other thread got weird and defensive real fast.
Better for who though? We could make it better for the richest 1000 people. That would be amazing.
Haha I haven’t seen anything from them in a while, but I remember seeing great pieces from them during the first Trump administration. Glad to know they’re still at it.
Stephen Miller?! CORRUPT??! It simply can’t be.
Hey guy. The other person’s point is that the Democratic establishment is going to abandon the “blue no matter who” thing to push Cuomo or Adams rather than the official blue candidate.
He’s kinda slouching I guess, and he’s looking off to the side. Maybe he really has to poop and is eyeing the path to the toilet. We need someone who will stand firm and shit their pants. Someone with gumption and a whole lot of PF Changs in their belly.
You wish there were queues for the custom games like there is for quick play? Trying to understand your comment here.
A book is 2.50.
Infuriating, but like, still better than Dr. Oz…?
Godless ass Esperanto…
C’est bon!
If this comment doesn’t deserve an upvote, I have no idea what does.
If I recall, it was a new file system. So instead if folders, every file would just kind of have tags and could be dynamically grouped like that. I could very well be wrong, but I remember being excited for it.
Yes, but racism (even subconsciously) was likely a contributing factor to her loss as well, which is what the other person was saying.
No, that’s Nintendo
The Scylla songs are maybe my favorite part.of the game, and there’s more?!
You make a good point that the shareholder/business owner class is more likely to have better safety nets. So from that standpoint, if the absolute value of their loss is greater, it could have a much less significant impact on their lives.
I think you may be underestimating the amount of small businesses though, at least in the US.
They don’t lose their life if a company goes under though? I don’t mean to diminish the contribution of workers. I think they need a much higher share of what companies take in, and they need more voices at their companies.
I get the sentiment and I’m all for workers sharing in profits, but what do they really risk by working at a company? Sure, the company can fail and they might be stuck in a bad situation, but shareholders and owners probably have it worse in that scenario, right?
He does read the teleprompter occasionally, but the reading glasses theory makes sense.