• 0 Posts
  • 55 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle











  • But, yes, any self-driving cars should absolutely be required to have lidar.

    So they think self-driving cars should have lidar, like a vacuum cleaner. They agree, and think it’s a good idea, right?

    I don’t think you could find any professional in the field that would argue that lidar is the proper tool for this.

    …then in the next sentence goes on to say that lidar is not the correct tool. In the space of a paragraph they make two points which directly contradict one-another. Hence my response:

    What is your point here, exactly?

    They could have said “oops, typo!” or something but, no, instead they went full on-condescending:

    I think you’re suffering from not knowing what you don’t know.

    I stand by my response:

    arrogant sack of dicks

    And while I’m not naive enough to believe that upvotes and downvotes are any kind of arbiter of objective truth, they at least seem to suggest, in this case, that my interpretation is broadly in line with the majority.


  • rmuk@feddit.uktolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldThe list of reasons
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’ve seen YaST used at a distance and I think it’s up to the job of managing servers and headless systems but, seriously, it’s not even close to Group Policy. I not trying to sound dismissive of alternatives - I really do want a FOSS replacement - but it is hard to overstate how flexible and granular Group Policy is.