• 0 Posts
  • 239 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2023

help-circle

  • Why are you taking a Republican senator at his word?

    They’re lying. They don’t know how this would actually play out, no one does

    It doesn’t matter what they say today… They’re going to immediately push this as far as they can if it gets through. They operate in bad faith, every time

    And maybe you’re right and that’s how it does play out… But this is a play that ends democracy if we lose.

    And let me remind you, they literally just argued in the supreme Court to do basically what I’m describing


  • The bond is meant to pay for damages of the lawsuit if it goes forward

    Can judges set it to $1? Maybe. Or maybe that’s grounds to have a mistrial, or lodge a complaint against the judge. Maybe it becomes another step in every lawsuit against the government - where both parties try to get the judge to nail down a cash value

    Or maybe, they can’t. What is the process of doing this? When is appropriate to take a bond, and when is it not?

    This administration will stretch the law as far as they can. Maybe the judiciary can win this fight, maybe the administration can use this as another shield.

    This is entirely legal theory - it’s not even law yet. No one knows how it would shake out. We have to read laws with the worst possible interpretation, because that’s how the administration is going to play any card you give them




  • Oh, I’m not saying it’s not horrible and not a terrible part of the bill…I think you what you laid out is pretty close to what they intend to do

    But I’m still saying, this doesn’t even matter. Literally, one of the buried clauses let’s the government blatantly ignore the courts, which means they get to blatantly ignore the law

    If they pass contempt clause, the federal courts lose all power over the executive. It even cuts the path to getting the supreme Court to hear cases on unconstitutionality

    This literally just doesn’t matter, because the brown shirts could do whatever they want, and the states would have no mechanism to stop them anyways





  • Who gives a fuck about that, it’s tied to making the executive branch immune to contempt charges for ignoring the courts, retroactively no less

    And it has a soft abortion ban (and maybe birth control too?) by banning any health plan that gets government assistance from providing it

    And then there’s weird shit… Like indoor tanning is getting a tax cut, as well as gun silencers

    Also, there’s the stuff on the label… Stripping food and medical care from the most vulnerable people. Which also fucks over farmers, because food stamps are a farming subsidy

    This whole bill is really, really bad



  • People don’t know what socialism is…Most people’s understanding of socialism includes the government doing basically anything

    What people want is free healthcare, affordable housing, tax the rich. We just need to double down on that populist messaging - and when they cry out “that’s socialism” we have to stop trying to run from it

    Tax the rich. How are we going to pay back our deficit? Tax the rich. Why does everything suck? Because we haven’t taxed the rich. What are we going to do in office? Tax the rich. Isn’t that socialism? Who cares, tax the rich.








  • That’s what they say it does. What it really does is make sites responsible for “harmful content” shown to minors

    It’s all completely vague. You say it just affects the kids mode accounts… The bill doesn’t say anything about that. It doesn’t provide any guidance on how to properly comply, just like the porn id laws.

    You can’t assume the government is going to use this for what they say they will. You have to look at what this would let them do as written

    Ultimately, this gives the government censorship powers over what is allowed in the “open” Internet, and to IDs users in the “adult” Internet


  • Because that’s not what this is. It’s just like the porn site laws

    How does a site comply? Maybe they use AI to look at your face, maybe they have you send in your license. The law isn’t clear what’s enough to prove it.

    How long until third parties step up? Nice convenient orgs that can sell the collected data that can guarantee compliance, because they sell the data to the government directly. Or even first parties… Facebook and Google are happy to sell this kind of info on their users

    This isn’t about protecting kids, it’s about identifying users. What they say this is for is good, what the laws actually do is far removed from that