That’s a cool article, I had a quick read and will go back to it later.

Inter-Process Interrupt seems to be very cool, but the fact you have to start it exactly when a pointer in the kernel is created makes it a big hit and miss, and the fact one cpu is frozen during the process may make it easy to detect she counter.

I can and will call Apple many things such as unusually greedy, the new Microsoft that got big decade ago and have to buy companies to have new successful products, marketing brainwashing, cult and more. But not incompetent when it comes to M1.

M1 laptops performance is not due to what most people believe, and all the side channel attacks unique to it I’ve heard from, come from speculative memory address loads. It’s pushing speculation in directions neither Intel nor AMD or Arm chips did before, and they’re released in a time where side channel attacks are starting to be very l well understood.

I’m sure there was an engineer saying this was a bad idea, over ruled by a manager under the pressure of CFO to make it happen. So I blame this on greed.

That’s what she said

Yep sure that’s the definition of a 0 day vulnerability, it was always there and suddenly someone found out.

What I’m saying is that I have a special interest in this topic and never heard of this problem for Arm before, and if some has more awareness than me I’d like to hear more from trusted sources.

Wasn’t it that those bugs were public knowledge by the time M1 was starting to sell? I guess recalls or delays to revenue are not acceptable.

Trophy for Apple being the first one to bring these speculative execution side channel attacks to Arm, because I’ve never heard of other cases. Ifi missed that please share enough details that I can find a white paper about it, because I don’t read those kind of news from media.

OMG she’s going to die, isn’t she?

Oh I see what you mean now, I installed obsidian on Android. I’m really liking the Linux client.

This way of granting access to Android folders is quite old and deprecated for a while. Give it a year or 2 and the following update will have to conform to new methods such as choosing specific folder, or Google should deny the update.

Source: I do Android dev and looked into this stuff a while back, can’t remember all the details anymore.

So, no pre installs needed, all they want is what the EU did.

We don’t need an article to say that.

So you want apple to help pre installing something so you didn’t depend on Apple when users actually want to use the app. Can you tell me how this makes sense?

There’s only one thing I hate most which is phone calls

No but I do think aggression is aggression, and the original quote mentions aggression.

If I got it right, file access in latest Android versions must ask permissions to the user, so it should be not an issue for you

That means the same as fossing the tcp so it bootstraps your privacy.

See I can sound like a bot too. Or a journo.