Depends.
On your property, using your voice? Sure.
At 2:30am, you yelling it 20ft from your neighbor’s house? Probably nor, mainly as it disturbs other people’s normal use of their home.
On someone else’s property? Depends on if they allow it.
In public, in the commons? Sure, as long as people are allowed to ignore you.
I think that was mainly due to the concern of hostile actors committing code to the kernel.
Which bots use Palemoon as their UA string?
It’s literally used anywhere that uses a latin derived alphabet… and a ton of Cyrillic cultures use it…
Not sure about other alphabets.
Kicked dog hollers.
More specifically, it’s capitalism that is the problem, not tech.
But the tariffs also pay the tax cuts that allow rich people to spend more and to invest more.
The wealthy don’t use their own money to do anything. They use their capital, to back loans, that they then loan to a corporation they created, in return for monthly fees from the corporation (To pay the loan), plus payment back as a loan.
This protects the person from any risk, as the corporation now has all the risk of repayment, and the individual has no risk in it.
Higher prices push down number of units sold… And push buyers outside of the US, to avoid the US products.
Not at the rate of his drug usage… His parts wont even be usable.
I refuse to debate ideas on how to make ethical CSAM with you.
Go find a pedo to figure out how you want to try to make CSAM, and you can well akshully all tou want.
yeah but like, legally, is this even a valid argument?
Personally, legal is only what the law allows the wealthy to do, and provides punishments for the working class.
Morally, that’s what you’re doing when you use AI to generate CSAM. Its the same idea why we ban all pre-created CSAM, as well, because you are victimizing the person every single time.
i dont see how this is even relevant, unless the person in question is a minor, a victim, or becoming a victim,
It makes them a victim.
But i don’t know of any laws that prevent you from doing that, unless it’s explicitly to do with something like blackmail, extortion, or harassment.
The law exists to protect the ruling class while not binding them, and to bind the working class without protecting them.
Does a facial structure recognition model use the likeness of other people?
Yes.
Even though it can detect any person that meets the requirements established by its training data? There is no suitable method to begin to breakdown at what point that persons likeness begins, and at what point it ends. it’s simply an impossible task.
Exactly. So, without consent, it shouldn’t be used. Periodt.
I dunno, I’d rather rip the bandaid off, because keep going down the “slow decay” route just means we kept strengthening the machine that is bringing us fascism, making it a more solidly in place system…
But you’re right: Fast descent to fascism, or slow descent. But, a fascist was the only options presented.
Where they get those insane ideas?
They’re not new. The Reich Wing has been saying this for decades, ever since Reagan started taking an ax to the program.
I mean, I can’t fault anyone who chose to sit out this election… they were offered 0 good choices.
And with the help of the other right wing party, by putting forth a candidate who insisted everything is fine, even when it isn’t.
No, the problem is a lack of consent of the person being used.
And now, being used to generate depictions of rape and CSAM.
With this logic, any output of any pic gen AI is abuse
Yes?
i have no problem with ai porn assuming it’s not based on any real identities
With any model in use, currently, that is impossible to meet. All models are trained on real images.
For a training set. Natural, and familiar conversations.