

They censored “fucking” (kind of), but not “shit”? What should Jesus say?
They censored “fucking” (kind of), but not “shit”? What should Jesus say?
There’s also the fact that it’s, y’know, a hospital.
So what’s the point of this?
This is a non-trivial task, and not simply because people will refuse to change their habits as they always do.
You say that “busy” should be “bizy”, but are you sure about that? If we decide that Y should always have an “ee” sound, what do you do with words that start with Y? Or are we going to make it the rule that it always has a Y sound at the beginning of a word and an ee sound at the end? What about a word like “ripe”? That’s a different-sounding I than the one you have in “bizy”, so would that be “ryp”? In that case, you have to have 3 pronunciations for Y: one each for when it occurs at the beginning, ending, and inside a word.
Wow, sounds like you have some anger management issues. As someone who used to struggle with this (and still do, to an extent), I recommend therapy.
That doesn’t sound correct. If you’re talking about breath, I would say “He became winded on his way up the path” or something like that. If you’re talking about traveling, I would say “He wound his way up the path.”
Just use a fork. I don’t know why I would use vanilla Firefox when there are so many great forks out there that have cool extra features.
No, that isn’t good for me. That’s my whole point. It isn’t good for anybody!
You said that the battle is lost. That sounds like giving up to me.
The rich and powerful want us to give up. Mitigation is still possible.
The propaganda has gone from:
“It doesn’t exist”
to
“Okay, it does exist, but it isn’t caused by humans.”
to
“Okay, it is caused by humans, but it’s too late to do anything about it now!”
Each one of those has been a lie that serves those in power. Don’t buy it.
Which is the vegan party?
Eh, you can download and run them locally now, and they don’t even phone home.
I’ve had them give me the exact same answer a second time. They politely apologized first, of course, and they were just as confident that it was correct as the first time.
Can you give an example?
I think this IS an AI tech bro. Or at least an AI tech bro dick-rider.
It’s pretty clear that the author doesn’t intend it as a compliment.
Maybe, but that doesn’t change the fact that it was trained on stolen artwork and is being used to put artists out of work. I think that, and the environmental effect, are better arguments against AI than some subjective statement about whether or not it’s good.
And the response has to be organized and political, not individualistic and consumerist.
Right. This isn’t an argument against veganism; it’s an argument for vegans getting organized.
If they were trolling, it would be top-tier. Just ignore the fucking obvious, tell them that they’re wrong, and then condescendingly tell them to educate themselves.