Summary

A federal judge criticized a Trump administration Justice Department lawyer who claimed they didn’t have to follow the judge’s oral order blocking deportations to El Salvador because it wasn’t in writing.

Judge Boasberg questioned why the administration ignored his directive to return immigrants to the US. The DOJ lawyer repeatedly refused to provide information about the deportations, citing “national security concerns.”

Frustrated, Boasberg ordered sworn declarations explaining what happened, quipping that he would issue a written order “since apparently my verbal orders don’t seem to carry much weight.”

    • Necroscope0@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Going to amuse me when the left picks up the 2nd amendment they have been talking shit about my whole life and use it for its intended purpose to kill a tyrant. This whole timeline makes my brain hurt

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You guys are maybe being a little hasty… Many other members of the Trump administration can get forcibly hauled into court even if Trump has “immunity.”

          • witten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            And let me know when you second amendment types actually do something. 👍

            • blakenong@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              You mean the people who wish death on people who are absolutely destroying humanity? Or, gun people? Because, I don’t own a gun. 🤷‍♂️

              • witten@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                17 hours ago

                Both. I just think the “oh well we must immediately escalate to bloodshed” people are only serving to worsen the situation because it skips over all the other legitimate ways we have of fighting back, like protest and the courts. Ways that a bigger portion of the populace is willing to participate in (currently). And right now we need everyone who’s reasonable resisting in any way they can.

                • blakenong@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  I seriously hope you’re right. I’d rather not see a bunch of people die. But I haven’t seen anything at all to suggest the usual ways are gonna work, and by the time we realize that it will be too late (if it’s not already).

                  Give me hope, tell me something that is actually going to stop them and is likely to work.

                  • witten@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    16 hours ago

                    No single thing is going to fix this. It’s going to take a concerted effort of protests and economic boycotts and judges doing their job and elected officials doing their job and the fucking media doing their job and public sentiment souring further on Trump and people refusing to follow unlawful orders and yes maybe even a little direct action. Not all of it is going to work and not all of it has to work. My only point here is we can’t just think there’s a single silver bullet (pun intended) because that breeds inaction for all other forms of resistance. We each need to find a way to resist and do that instead of waiting for somebody who isn’t coming to save the day.