• bigfish@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    Problem is that right now he’s just talking. The states will have to wait for him to actually cause harm to prosecute him. Then the election will already be in chaos…

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      States should be able to seek security guarantees with valid reasoning, of which this rhetoric should qualify. That should be administerable without interference. For example, what if a state could work with foreign allies in times of dire — e.g., to secure distribution for mail ballots? Or perhaps if they could deputize their own labor forces for such things, while having funding secured for such possibilities?

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      So if someone announces they’re going to burn down a shopping mall, the cops can’t stop them?