cm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agoStatisticians, is this true?infosec.pubimagemessage-square80linkfedilinkarrow-up1497arrow-down16
arrow-up1491arrow-down1imageStatisticians, is this true?infosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agomessage-square80linkfedilink
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoObvious would be top to bottom. You know, like how every human reads.
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoFor replies, yes. And that is the case. But the first one is a quote, not a reply
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoAnd it makes sense to put the reply before the thing they’re replying to.
Obvious would be top to bottom. You know, like how every human reads.
For replies, yes. And that is the case. But the first one is a quote, not a reply
And it makes sense to put the reply before the thing they’re replying to.