• Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    So here we are: you want to have someone that can focus on instance administration and you want to focus on building communities, but God forbid you even considering doing it a way that is only tangentially connected to a commercial venture. That is the part I don’t understand.

    None of the admins of the instances above have stated that they are actively looking to make a business out of the platform.

      • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Let me phrase in another way: all of the admins teams of the instances above are different. They are all different teams, but I regularly interact with them, and they are all quite nice people to talk to. I even like talking to the LW sysadmins.

        On the other hand, why would I host a community to one of your instances, when all you do is argue with me? We have different visions on the platform, and that’s fine. I don’t even get why you suggest one of instances, it seems a bad idea due to our regular disagreements.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          My tone changed after you refused any form of collaboration and resorted to the most absurd excuses (like the football domain episode).

          I wasn’t being hostile to you when you came asking if you could have access to the user votes. I thought it was something visible for moderators, but when you said that it was only for admins I even offered to host an instance for you for free. All you needed to do was get a domain name. You refused.

          • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            And your tone now is pleasant and agreeable.

            The football episode was when you revealed how much you were paying for all those domain names for the 20 instances, as well as the operating costs. Again, seemed like a risk to me. The domain itself wasn’t the actual reason, it was the risk of seeing you disappear overnight or having to cease operations due to cost.

            I refused the free instance because I didn’t want to use your resources for something as minor as being able to see votes.

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              And your tone now is pleasant and agreeable.

              Now, it certainly isn’t.

              Again, seemed like a risk to me.

              What if I told you that Communick has reached break-even point, and since February it makes more in revenue than it costs to operate?

              Oh, that’s right, I told you that already! It’s just that you didn’t react to it. Could it be because it doesn’t fit your worldview?

                • rglullis@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  If you prefer to avoid the conversation on the basis of “unpleasantness” instead of facing the arguments that are being presented to you, it’s your choice.

                  But at least show some decency and willingness to admit you were wrong and consider that maybe the best way to get a sustainable, healthy and universal Fediverse (i.e, not just a niche thing that barely reaches 1M MAU) is by having small businesses around?

                  • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    My main reason to want to end conversations with you is that you use bad faith arguments. It also explains why I don’t want to build community on your instances.

                    I regularly suggest to agree to disagree, you just don’t want to.

                    Let’s give this another try

                    • the Lemmy devs are funded by NLNet donations and user donations, no business
                    • LW, lemm.ee, lemmy.zip, all of the top 20 or 50 instances are funded via donations

                    universal Fediverse (i.e, not just a niche thing that barely reaches 1M MAU)

                    How is having a business going to change that? The platform is here, Boost is a clone from it’s Reddit version, Voyager and others offer good alternatives.

                    Network effect can’t be fought by money. Meta spend millions on marketing Threads, it’s a failure.

                    Finally, I recently asked how many people were ready to pay for the Fediverse: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/33116369?scrollToComments=true

                    Seems to reflect my perception that some people are okay to pay 10-20$ per year, but not much more, and that’s not everyone. I’ll repost it to the new community now so that we have more data.

                    Now again, if you believe so, that’s your choice, please create a community to advocate for that perspective.