Fridayās appeals court ruling in the New Jersey case goes further than a July 2024 ruling from a federal judge, who said that the stateās ban on AR-15s specifically was unconstitutional but upheld the provision barring larger magazines.
The third US circuit court of appeals said on Friday in its opinion that the stateās ban on all semiautomatic rifles it deems to be āassault firearmsā and its restriction on ālarge capacity ammunition magazinesā were unconstitutional.
New Jerseyās attorney general, Jennifer Davenport, a Democrat whose office defended the law, told the Associated Press that the decision is āas unfortunate as it is legally incorrectā.
āGotta maximize the body count of school childrenā
-These judges, probably
And gun control is often repealed when the dominant group in society wishes to increase violence against minorities.
Boy thatās a real convenient generalization there. Any time the people are allowed more rights itās for racist reasons, therefore more rights should be restricted?
But also the state already has carte blanc to be racist, they have a monopoly on force and justice. They donāt need to give the citizens any rights if they just want to be racist.
No, youāre right. We should never examine why anything happens as long as it increases rights.
Youād be cool with my right to punch you in the face, wouldnāt you?
Glad people like you self-select against having dangerous objects in their possession.