Ubuntu is the leading distro, if I’m not mistaken. It’s also compatible with Mint, Zorin, Xubuntu, etc, which are another leading distros than Fedora. Is it only for redhat users or secondary distro?

  • overcast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago
    • the corporate side of Red Hat is far less evident on Fedora than Canonical’s on Ubuntu

    • vanilla UX

    • Atomic editions

    • fast yet stable updates

    • more lightweight ISO

    it also has disadvantages, specially for nontechnical folks

    • Free Software Policy (NVIDIA drivers and some codecs not pre-installed)
    • non LTS version available (Atomic desktops are easier to manage if keeping un-updated for very long periods)
    • it uses RPM packages which are good, but there might be some software only offering DEBs (containers and extraction tools can help with that)
  • Remy@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    I prefer Fedora over Ubuntu because they are more up to date and put Flatpak over Snap.

    But the real reason I originally switched was that the Ubuntu installer crashed 5 times in a row and then I tried Fedora and liked it

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Go ahead and try Ubuntu and let me know how much you love their “App Store” experience. So many broken apps in their Snap store.

    Fedora just works. Ubuntu is like the Windows of Linux. They think they know better than their users and, as such, try to force feed you the things they think are better, even when they’re worse.

    • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Avoid Fedora Flatpaks (their repo, not Flathub) because of broken apps. OBS got pissed at them a while back for user reporting bugs that were only present in the downstream repackaging by Fedora. Broken af.

  • Limeade3425@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Personally, I really like dnf over apt, SELinux over apparmor, and firewalld over ufw, but it’s all personal preference.

    • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t know how they do it because I’m too lazy to read source code, but dnf’s conflict resolution algorithms are so crazily good it’s scary. I have borked my Fedora installation beyond repair, or so I thought, then I chrooted and upgraded and had a fresh new good install with all my data intact.

  • nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    It’s also compatible with Mint, Zorin, Xubuntu, etc, which are another leading distros than Fedora.

    What do you mean? Any distro is compatible with any other distro.

    Ubuntu forces Snaps (app packaging format) down your throat that take up more space and RAM than Flatpaks, were developed with powerful servers in mind first and common user second and are less commutity-developed standard. Also, last time I checked it had some sponsored bloatware.

    • ffhein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      They might be thinking of .deb vs .rpm

      I haven’t touched it in a few years but I had to switch distro because (X)Ubuntu filled my system SSD with multiple copied of every single Snap it had installed. Iirc it saved the last 3 versions and there was no way of turning it off

      IMO Ubuntu is a good fit for people who don’t want to learn anything about computers and have no opinions about how their OS should work, so they want someone else to make all decisions for them. Nothing inherently wrong with that, it’s just not for me. I switched to Fedora because I want to be in control of my computer

  • mertn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    #Ubuntu has snaps which are a really annoying way to distribute software updates. I was a long term #Ubuntu user but have moved to #debian, with #Kde if I need a GUI instead of that horrid #gnome rubbish. All the third party software I use works just as well on debian as it did in ubuntu.

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Ubuntu (which is based on Debian) can be too slow to adopt newer software.

    Arch on the other side is too quick.

    Fedora is a good balance in-between.

    Nearly all other distros are derived from these 3 families.

    That and Ubuntu’s obsession with Snaps is unhealthy. So many people recommend Debian or Mint over Ubuntu, if you want something very stable.

    • dashdanw@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Interesting I would have assumed it was slower than Ubuntu in comparison given it’s association with RHEL but looking it up it’s sort of their “tip of the spear” when it comes to release testing. TIL