If the judges have those personal beliefs and a case related to that comes before them I’d want them to consider the law not their personal beliefs, so we shouldn’t have to be identifying them in this way.

We’ve come to identify them by their political leaning because it has come to the point that we get rulings based on their political leaning as opposed to what the law says. Hell it’s why muskrat was pushing for “his” judge to win. He knew that the judge he backed would rule in his favor and we know he would have ruled in favor of Republicans plans for gerrymandering when that absofucukinglutly should not be the case. :(