• alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    It is quite safe. What I heard about this case is that the victim was happy with the outcome.

    They met at a party, she was drunk. He said he asked consent, she said he raped her. There was no evidence or allegation of force, just that she couldn’t have consented in her drunken state.

    He had a clean record.

    He got convicted and ordered to pay €3500 and if he commits another crime, then this one will count too.

    She was satisfied with the outcome. She especially wanted recognition that it was rape.

    I think this is a good outcome. If he ever rapes someone again, he’ll be a serial rapist and get the book thrown at him.

    And on the flipside, I find it difficult to throw the book at people under the circumstances in these kind of cases.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      They met at a party

      According to this article in DM she’s on camera stumbling around the city streets so drunk that should couldn’t stay upright and that’s where she ran into this guy. Of course that article also says this happened at “quarter to five at night.” which makes no sense.

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        There are a few other articles it seems - this one has:

        While the victim has found some solace in the court’s recognition of her assault, she is disappointed that her attacker faces no real consequences.

        Which says she was not happy with the outcome, only that the rape was recognized.

        Per this article:

        Leuven University Hospital has suspended a medical student that was convicted of raping another student but was not sentenced for his crime.

        The school has at least ensured there were some measure of consequences. Also:

        Chief physician Gert Van Assche said that "First and foremost our thoughts go out to the victim. Together with KU Leuven we will look at the court’s ruling and examine how we will go on from there. In the meantime, as a precautionary measure the doctor concerned has been suspended from duties at the hospital”.

        The only other article was paywalled and seemed to have no additional information anyway.

        Edit: I think its worth noting, though it can be seen in the link, he was studying gynecology.

      • anon6789@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Also how many people will potentially suffer before another one comes forward and gets taken seriously? 🤨

        Nevertheless, the judge refrained from passing sentence. “It is undeniable that he passed the line of what is permissible. The man showed a lack of respect for the victim’s physical, psychological and sexual boundaries.

        I don’t know how they do it over there, but where I’m from, those are 3 things someone should probably respect if they’re going to be placed in a position requiring great trust like a doctor…