There’s a style of ‘animation’ that has become widely used on YouTube where they take a still image of a character then make them sway back and forth repetitively. I guess it’s cheap to make but I find it distracting and weird, even a bit patronising, as if they think we need moving pictures to keep us interested. I think it started with Veritassium and spread to other edutainment YouTube channels and now I just flat out avoid channels which use it.
Anyone else find it annoying?
When you deliver a talk in real life, you don’t just stand there like a statue as you click through the slides.
Good presenters know it engages the audience a lot more if you move around the room, motion at the slides, use hand gestures to emphasise your point. People fundamentally respond better to that, and that’s just human nature.
Stick figure animation is the equivalent for YouTube presenters who don’t want to show their face.
You might find it patronising, but it works.
No doubt at all. I’m probably just in the minority who pay it too much attention. It’s like visual tinnitus to me.
Stick figures are far less jarring for me, it’s when they try to create semi realistic characters that sway repeatedly that it bothers me
That’s all the animation we got back in the day. I like it because it reminds me of the past and it is a way that everybody can animate without having the tools or skills yet
That’s a nice nostalgic take. I do remember a similar style being used in some flash videos and that didn’t bother me at the time. I think maybe it’s just become too common and feels lazy. Kind of like how Memphis art style was once unique and fresh but then became very associated with a bland corporate aesthetic.
Corporate Memphis isn’t the same as Memphis Design’s postmodern art style, though it was inspired by it - corporate Memphis is literally a Facebook product.
It seems my lack of art knowledge is showing 😅. Thanks for setting the record straight!
No, it is a technique used since puppets exist, it is much worse when your characters don’t move at all. There has to be some kind of movement, either swaying, jumping up and down, pan and zoom or something else. Here is where animators can shine if they are good puppeteers, if not, it is like bad acting.
I feel like when puppeteers and rubber hose animators have cyclic animation they add to the characters personality. A character like miss piggy flops around dramatically, Kermit crumples awkwardly, Betty Boop bobs around perkily. The animation you see on YouTube are basically - define arms legs and head then sway back and forth every 2 seconds - copy for all characters.
It is the difference between putting some interest and not giving a fuck.
Yes, and in particular because of the patronising thing you mention. Just like lots of the other things they do on the veritasium channel you gave as an example. Because they are things no one does because they think it makes their video better, but because it is known to drive engagement.
You mean like the whole rigged 2d animations where they just deform an image instead of having it move properly? I hate that.
Unfortunately the urge to create and push content has created a lot of illustrations and animation that is total tat. Just because you can does not mean you should. It’s the same as the insta tropes, unoriginal and annoying AF.
The thing is…creators are gonna keep doing it if people keep mindlessly watching it. So easiest way is to review just how much slop you consume. I am not trying to be condescending, just an observation.
It never looks good when people do this
yes and I fucking hate it
Eh I do appreciate motion comics
I can’t imagine that it’s cheaper than not doing it. I think the visuals are useful storytelling aids; they help me keep track of characters in a story, especially if a story has a lot of characters. I’ve never really thought about the passive animations, but if I had to hazard a guess I’d say it’s either a way to keep the eye trained on a visual element (e.g., moving a character or object while that object is being discussed by the narration), a ploy to increase retention, or maybe the animator just likes having things animated even if they aren’t performing a specific action at the moment.
I’ve never really been bothered by it, I think it’s just a stylistic choice.
It’s creepy. I block everything that uses it so I don’t have to see it accidentally.
Yep know exactly what you mean and absolutely hate it.
It’s TEMU Ken Burns.
Yes! CCG companies use it to make “trailers” and I hate it.
I don’t. When they’re used to progress articulation of what they’re talking about, it’s a need.
What would you prefer? Minutes and minutes of text? Did you expect full fledged movies?
